Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29600335›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2018

Radiation exposure for intraoperative 3D scans in a hybrid operating room: how to reduce radiation exposure for the surgical team.

K Schuetze, M Kraus, A Eickhoff, F Gebhard, P H Richter

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Automated Digital Image Optimisation in Intraoperative 2D and 3D Imaging Using a Mobile C-Arm With Flat-Panel Detector.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K SchuetzeDepartment of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany. konrad.schuetze@uniklinik-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6607-2539
M KrausDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ulm University, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
A EickhoffDepartment of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
F GebhardDepartment of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
P H RichterDepartment of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DE

Funding

AO Trauma Foundation S-13-128K
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHybrid operating rooms are used in different fields of surgery. In orthopedic surgery, the possibility of a 3D scan of difficult anatomical regions (spine, pelvis) showed promising results not only in navigated screw placement. The associated exposure to radiation raises questions regarding potential risks for the operating room personal and the patient. The present study focuses on scatter radiation during 3D scans in a hybrid operating room, the adjacent rooms, and methods to reduce radiation exposure. MATERIAL AND

methods[Formula: see text] i2 dosimeters were used to measure scatter radiation during 3D scans of different anatomical regions in different distances and heights in a hybrid operating room. The 3D scans were performed with a floor-based flat-panel robotic C-arm with 3D scan capability (Artis Zeego, Siemens; Germany). The 3D scans were performed using a human cadaver. The 3D scans were performed using a standard and a dose reduction protocol (DRP).

resultsThe highest scatter radiation was measured during 3D scans of the pelvis on the side of the surgical assistant (39.5 µSv in height of 1 m) compared to the side of the main surgeon (23 µSv in height of 1 m). Scatter radiation was less on the position of the scrub nurse (6.8 µSv in height of 1 m) and during 3D scans of the other anatomical regions. The radiation dosage was about 66% less with the DRP. Low values of scatter radiation were measured behind a radiation protection wall and with open doors in the adjacent rooms.

conclusionWhile performing a scan scatter radiation was measured everywhere in the operating room especially during 3D scans of the pelvic girdle. Therefore, settings with lower dosage should be used whenever possible. Personnel should stand behind a radiation safety wall or leave the operating room and close the doors. For this study, six behavioral rules to avoid radiation in a hybrid operating room were established.

Indexed as

FluoroscopyOperating RoomsOrthopedic ProceduresBone ScrewsGermanyHealth PersonnelHumansOccupational ExposureRadiation DosageRadiation ExposureHybrid-OROccupational radiationRadiation safetyRadiological protection

Identifiers

PMID29600335
OpenAlexW2794717008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.