Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29600323›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2019

Assessment of polyurethane spheres as surrogates for military ballistic head injury.

Peter Mahoney, Debra Carr, Nicholas Hunt, Russ J Delaney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Projectile deformation on human bone and on a polyurethane simulant.International journal of legal medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Interpol review of forensic firearm examination 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The ballistic performance of bone when impacted by fragments.International journal of legal medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter MahoneyCentre for Defence Engineering, Cranfield University at the Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, SN6 8LA, Shrivenham, UK. p.f.mahoney@cranfield.ac.uk.
Debra CarrDefence and Security Accelerator, Porton Down, SP4 OJQ, Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK.
Nicholas HuntForensic Pathology Services, Grove Technology Park, Wantage, OX12 9FA, Oxon, UK.
Russ J DelaneySouth West Forensic Pathology Group Practice, PO Box 388, BS9 0DB, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SYNBONE® spheres were impacted with 7.62 × 39 mm mild steel core ammunition at a mean impact velocity of 654 m/s, SD 7 m/s, to simulate engagement distances of around 50-100 m. The wounds and fracture patterns were assessed by two forensic pathologists familiar with military cranial injury. The overall fracture pattern was assessed as being too comminuted when compared with actual injury. This suggests the SYNBONE® spheres have less utility for simulating military injury than other purposes described in the literature.

Indexed as

Head Injuries, PenetratingModels, BiologicalWounds, GunshotForensic BallisticsGelatinHead Protective DevicesHumansMilitary PersonnelPolyurethanesSkullSoftwareGelatinPolyurethanes7.62 × 39 mm bulletBallistic traumaCranial fractures

Identifiers

PMID29600323
PMCPMC6342876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.