ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2018
Objective Evaluation of Visual Fatigue Using Binocular Fusion Maintenance.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of Visual Fatigue Using Eye Tracking and a Wearable Device.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Safety Evaluation in Healthy Adults of Motion-Based Virtual Reality Dichoptic Training for Pediatric Patients With Amblyopia: Prospective Intervention Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Objective Evaluation of Relationship Between Tear Film Stability and Visual Fatigue [Response to Letter].Clinical optometry · 2025Article
- Objective Evaluation of Relationship Between Tear Film Stability and Visual Fatigue.Clinical optometry · 2025Article
- Evaluation of VDT-Induced Visual Fatigue by Automatic Detection of Blink Features.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A comparison of accommodation and ocular discomfort change according to display size of smart devices.BMC ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Article
- Evaluation of Visual Disturbances After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-A One-Year Follow-up Study.The Journal of head trauma rehabilitationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn this study, we investigated whether an individual's visual fatigue can be evaluated objectively and quantitatively from their ability to maintain binocular fusion.
methodsBinocular fusion maintenance (BFM) was measured using a custom-made binocular open-view Shack-Hartmann wavefront aberrometer equipped with liquid crystal shutters, wherein eye movements and wavefront aberrations were measured simultaneously. Transmittance in the liquid crystal shutter in front of the subject's nondominant eye was reduced linearly, and BFM was determined from the transmittance at the point when binocular fusion was broken and vergence eye movement was induced. In total, 40 healthy subjects underwent the BFM test and completed a questionnaire regarding subjective symptoms before and after a visual task lasting 30 minutes.
resultsBFM was significantly reduced after the visual task (
conclusionsThese results suggest that BFM can be used as an indicator for evaluating visual fatigue. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: BFM can be used to evaluate the visual fatigue caused by the new visual devices, such as head-mount display, objectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.