Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29599929›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Tooth loss and cancer risk: a dose-response meta analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Jun Shi, Weidong Leng, Lunhua Zhao, Cai Deng, Chenli Xu, Jue Wang, Yu Wang, Xingchun Peng

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bladder cancer risk factors: a comprehensive umbrella review of meta-analyses.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Association between tamoxifen and tooth loss in women with breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The potential role ofInfectious agents and cancer · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun ShiDepartment of Stomatology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, China.
Weidong LengDepartment of Stomatology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, China.
Lunhua ZhaoSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, China.
Cai DengDepartment of Stomatology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, China.
Chenli XuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, China.
Jue WangSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, China.
Yu WangDepartment of Ultrasonography, Xiangyang No.1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang, Hubei, 441000, China.
Xingchun PengSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, China.
Hubei University of Medicine · CNTaihe Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conflicting results to identify the relationship between tooth loss and cancer risk. Therefore, a dose-response meta-analysis was performed to clarify and quantitative assessed the correlation between tooth loss and cancer risk. Up to March 2017, 25 observational epidemiological studies were included in current meta-analysis. Tooth loss was significantly associated with a higher risk of cancer. Additionally, tooth loss was associated with significantly a higher risk of esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, head and neck cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreas cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, bladder cancer and hematopoietic cancer. Subgroup analysis showed consistent findings. Furthermore, a significant dose-response relationship was observed between tooth loss and cancer risk. Increasing per 10 of tooth loss was associated with a 9% increment of cancer risk, 14% increment of esophageal cancer risk, 9% increment of gastric cancer risk, 31% increment of head and neck cancer risk, 4% increment of colorectal cancer risk, 7% increment of pancreas cancer risk, 19% increment of lung cancer risk, 2% increment of bladder cancer risk and 3% increment of hematopoietic cancer risk. Considering these promising results, tooth loss might be harmful for health. Large sample size, different ethnic population and different cancer type are warranted to validate this association.

Indexed as

cancerdose–response relationshipmeta analysistooth loss

Identifiers

PMID29599929
PMCPMC5871100
OpenAlexW2782515118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.