Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29599739›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

Illusory Motion Reproduced by Deep Neural Networks Trained for Prediction.

Eiji Watanabe, Akiyoshi Kitaoka, Kiwako Sakamoto, Masaki Yasugi, Kenta Tanaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluating large language models in theory of mind tasks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Optimization in Visual Motion Estimation.Annual review of vision science · 2024
    Review
  11. Predictive coding networks for temporal prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Learning on Arbitrary Graph Topologies via Predictive Coding.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eiji WatanabeLaboratory of Neurophysiology, National Institute for Basic Biology, Okazaki, Japan.
Akiyoshi KitaokaDepartment of Psychology, Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kiwako SakamotoDepartment of Physiological Sciences, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), Miura, Japan.
Masaki YasugiLaboratory of Neurophysiology, National Institute for Basic Biology, Okazaki, Japan.
Kenta TanakaSakura Research Office, Wako, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebral cortex predicts visual motion to adapt human behavior to surrounding objects moving in real time. Although the underlying mechanisms are still unknown, predictive coding is one of the leading theories. Predictive coding assumes that the brain's internal models (which are acquired through learning) predict the visual world at all times and that errors between the prediction and the actual sensory input further refine the internal models. In the past year, deep neural networks based on predictive coding were reported for a video prediction machine called PredNet. If the theory substantially reproduces the visual information processing of the cerebral cortex, then PredNet can be expected to represent the human visual perception of motion. In this study, PredNet was trained with natural scene videos of the self-motion of the viewer, and the motion prediction ability of the obtained computer model was verified using unlearned videos. We found that the computer model accurately predicted the magnitude and direction of motion of a rotating propeller in unlearned videos. Surprisingly, it also represented the rotational motion for illusion images that were not moving physically, much like human visual perception. While the trained network accurately reproduced the direction of illusory rotation, it did not detect motion components in negative control pictures wherein people do not perceive illusory motion. This research supports the exciting idea that the mechanism assumed by the predictive coding theory is one of basis of motion illusion generation. Using sensory illusions as indicators of human perception, deep neural networks are expected to contribute significantly to the development of brain research.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecerebral cortexdeep learningpredictive codingvisual illusions

Identifiers

PMID29599739
PMCPMC5863044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.