Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29599501›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2018

Piercing the dark matter: bioinformatics of long-range sequencing and mapping.

Fritz J Sedlazeck, Hayan Lee, Charlotte A Darby, Michael C Schatz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 310 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
310citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

310 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. DNA Replication Errors Drive Genome-Wide Small Inverted Triplication Dynamics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Special Issue "Human Traits and Genomics: An Integrative Perspective".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Special Issue "Repetitive DNA".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

250 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fritz J SedlazeckHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6040-2691
Hayan LeeDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0571-3192
Charlotte A DarbyDepartment of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2195-5300
Michael C SchatzDepartment of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. mschatz@cs.jhu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several new genomics technologies have become available that offer long-read sequencing or long-range mapping with higher throughput and higher resolution analysis than ever before. These long-range technologies are rapidly advancing the field with improved reference genomes, more comprehensive variant identification and more complete views of transcriptomes and epigenomes. However, they also require new bioinformatics approaches to take full advantage of their unique characteristics while overcoming their complex errors and modalities. Here, we discuss several of the most important applications of the new technologies, focusing on both the currently available bioinformatics tools and opportunities for future research.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsChromosome MappingComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.