Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29599444›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Environmental complexity buffers against stress-induced negative judgement bias in female chickens.

Josefina Zidar, Irene Campderrich, Emelie Jansson, Anette Wichman, Svante Winberg, Linda Keeling, Hanne Løvlie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Looking beyond the Shoal: Fish Welfare as an Individual Attribute.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  14. Changes in Stereotypies: Effects over Time and over Generations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Effects of Key Farm Management Practices on Pullets Welfare-A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Josefina ZidarDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, IFM Biology, Linköping University, SE 581 83, Linköping, Sweden. josefina.zidar@gmail.com.
Irene CampderrichDepartment of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Emelie JanssonDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, IFM Biology, Linköping University, SE 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
Anette WichmanDepartment of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Svante WinbergDepartment of Neuroscience, Uppsala Biomedical Centre BMC, Uppsala University, Box SE 751 24, Uppsala, Sweden.
Linda KeelingDepartment of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hanne LøvlieDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, IFM Biology, Linköping University, SE 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
Linköping University · SESwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive processes are often biased by emotions. In humans, affective disorders are accompanied by pessimistic judgement, while optimistic judgement is linked to emotional stability. Similar to humans, animals tend to interpret ambiguous stimuli negatively after experiencing stressful events, although the long-lasting impact on judgement bias has rarely been investigated. We measure judgement bias in female chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus) after exposure to cold stress, and before and after exposure to additional unpredictable stressors. Additionally, we explore if brain monoamines can explain differences in judgement bias. Chicks exposed to cold stress did not differ in judgement bias compared to controls, but showed sensitivity to additional stressors by having higher motivation for social reinstatement. Environmental complexity reduced stress-induced negative judgement bias, by maintaining an optimistic bias in individuals housed in complex conditions even after stress exposure. Moreover, judgement bias was related to dopamine turnover rate in mesencephalon, with higher activity in individuals that had a more optimistic response. These results demonstrate that environmental complexity can buffer against negative effects of additive stress and that dopamine relates to judgement bias in chicks. These results reveal that both internal and external factors can mediate emotionally biased judgement in animals, thus showing similarities to findings in humans.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiogenic MonoaminesBrainChickensCold-Shock ResponseFemaleJudgmentBiogenic Monoamines

Identifiers

PMID29599444
PMCPMC5876351
OpenAlexW2794466496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.