Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29597279›Full record

ReviewCancers2018

The Hippo Pathway: Immunity and Cancer.

Zaid Taha, Helena J Janse van Rensburg, Xiaolong Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Regulation and Function of Hippo/YAP Pathway in Cancer.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Establishment of a mInternational journal of genomics · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular Mechanism of TRAF6 in Malignant Proliferation of Human NK/T Cell Lymphoma Cell HANK1.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zaid TahaDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada. zaid.taha@queensu.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-2660-0560
Helena J Janse van RensburgDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada. 8vrhjj@queensu.ca.
Xiaolong YangDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada. yangx@queensu.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-8073-8675

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its discovery, the Hippo pathway has emerged as a central signaling network in mammalian cells. Canonical signaling through the Hippo pathway core components (MST1/2, LATS1/2, YAP and TAZ) is important for development and tissue homeostasis while aberrant signaling through the Hippo pathway has been implicated in multiple pathologies, including cancer. Recent studies have uncovered new roles for the Hippo pathway in immunology. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms by which Hippo signaling in pathogen-infected or neoplastic cells affects the activities of immune cells that respond to these threats. We further discuss how Hippo signaling functions as part of an immune response. Finally, we review how immune cell-intrinsic Hippo signaling modulates the development/function of leukocytes and propose directions for future work.

Indexed as

cancerHippo pathwayimmunologyimmunotherapyinflammationLATS1/2MST1/2PD-L1TAZYAP

Identifiers

PMID29597279
PMCPMC5923349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.