Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29597244›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Fractionation, Bioaccessibility, and Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in the Soil of an Urban Recreational Area Amended with Composted Sewage Sludge.

Kai Yang, Tao Zhang, Yanqiu Shao, Chao Tian, Stephen R Cattle, Ying Zhu, Jinjuan Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Relationship between Urban Green Spaces and Cancer: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Soil Pollution and Remediation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kai YangAdvanced Materials Institute, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014, China. yangk@sdas.org.ORCID 0000-0002-9712-6333
Tao ZhangAdvanced Materials Institute, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014, China. zhangtao@sdas.org.
Yanqiu ShaoAdvanced Materials Institute, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014, China. shaoyq@sdas.org.
Chao TianAdvanced Materials Institute, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014, China. tianchao@sdas.org.
Stephen R CattleSydney Institute of Agriculture, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Eveleigh, NSW 2015, Australia. stephen.cattle@sydney.edu.au.
Ying ZhuAdvanced Materials Institute, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014, China. zhuyingee@163.com.
Jinjuan SongQuality, Safety and Environmental Protection Department, China International Water and Electric Corporation, Beijing 100120, China. song_jinjuan@ctg.com.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A composted sewage sludge (CSS) was added to the soil of an urban garden at 5%, 10%, and 25% (

Indexed as

CompostingBiological AvailabilityChemical FractionationEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutionHumansMetals, HeavyRisk AssessmentSewageSoilSoil PollutantsMetals, HeavySewageSoilSoil Pollutantsbiosolidsexposurefactorsin vitro testland applicationmobilitysequential extractiontrace elements

Identifiers

PMID29597244
PMCPMC5923655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.