ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2018
Genome engineering for CNS injury and disease.
Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-Generation Strategies for Neural Repair and Regeneration: Neural Organoid Transplantation in the CNS.Cell proliferation · 2026Review
- Modelling Neurological Diseases in Large Animals: Criteria for Model Selection and Clinical Assessment.Cells · 2022Review
- Recent advances in nanotherapeutic strategies for spinal cord injury repair.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2019Review
- Challenges of gene delivery to the central nervous system and the growing use of biomaterial vectors.Brain research bulletin · 2019Review
- RNA interference in glial cells for nerve injury treatment.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent developments in genome engineering methods have advanced our knowledge of central nervous system (CNS) function in both normal health and following disease or injury. This review discusses current literature using gene editing tools in CNS disease and injury research, such as improving viral-mediated targeting of cell populations, generating new methods for genome editing, reprogramming cells into CNS cell types, and using organoids as models of development and disease. Readers may gain inspiration for continuing research into new genome engineering methods and for therapies for CNS applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.