Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29596623›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2020

So Close and Yet So Irritating: Negative Relations and Implications for Well-being by Age and Closeness.

Kira S Birditt, Carey W Sherman, Courtney A Polenick, Lucia Becker, Noah J Webster, Kristine J Ajrouch, Toni C Antonucci

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Implications of Cumulative Life Event Stress for Daily Stress Exposure and Cardiovascular Reactivity Among Black and White Americans.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Rethinking Social Relationships in Adulthood: The Differential Investment of Resources Model.Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  7. Resolution Status and Age as Moderators for Interpersonal Everyday Stress and Stressor-Related Affect.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kira S BirdittInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Carey W ShermanInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Courtney A PolenickDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Lucia BeckerInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Noah J WebsterInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Kristine J AjrouchInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Toni C AntonucciInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
University of Michigan · USEastern Michigan University · US

Funding

Research Education CoreP30AG024824 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Andrzej T Galecki · 2004 to 2026
$29.2M
Pilot CoreP30AG022845 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Manney Carrington Reid, ELAINE WETHINGTON · 2003 to 2026
$15.2M
Training Geriatric Mental Health Services ResearchersT32MH073553 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI BRUCE, MARTHA L · 2005 to 2019
$6.4M
Social Relations, Aging and Health: Competing Theories and Emerging Complexities - Administrative SupplementR01AG045423 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ANTONUCCI, TONI CLAUDETTE · 2013 to 2017
$3.3M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG022845NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024824NIA NIH HHS R01 AG045423NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH073553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNegative social relationships are associated with poor health, chronic illness, and mortality. Yet, we know little about the dynamics of negative aspects of relationships within individual's closest relationships over time, how those experiences vary by age, and the implications of those relationships for well-being.

methodA total of 592 participants (ages 25-97; M = 57.5; 63.3% women) from the Social Relations Study completed monthly web surveys for up to 12 months. Each month they reported negative relationship quality with their three closest network members and multiple dimensions of well-being (positive affect, negative affect, self-rated health, and sleep quality).

resultsMultilevel models revealed older individuals reported less negativity in their relationships than younger people, but fewer age differences in the closest tie. Greater negative relationship quality predicted poor well-being (i.e., greater negative affect, sleep problems). Links between negative relations and well-being were less strong among older individuals; especially in the closest ties. DISCUSSION: Results were partially consistent with the strength and vulnerability integration (SAVI) model, which proposes fewer age-related improvements in emotion regulation when individuals are unable to avoid tensions. Despite feeling just as negative as younger individuals, older individuals may be more resilient to tensions in their closest relationships.

Indexed as

Emotional AdjustmentEmotionsInterpersonal RelationsAdultAffectAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsHealth StatusHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSleepAgingInterpersonal tensionNegative relationship qualityWell-being

Identifiers

PMID29596623
PMCPMC7179808
OpenAlexW2794695488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.