Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29596574›Full record

SynthesisJAMA facial plastic surgery2018

Efficacy and Safety of Autologous Fat Transfer in Facial Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Todor K Krastev, Jip Beugels, Juliette Hommes, Andrzej Piatkowski, Irene Mathijssen, Rene van der Hulst

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA facial plastic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Lipotranferences in post neurosurgical esthetic defects.Surgical neurology international · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Fat transfer after parotidectomy: fat resorption rates, aesthetic and functional outcomes of en-bloc fat graft versus lipofilling technique.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Todor K KrastevDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Jip BeugelsDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Juliette HommesDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Andrzej PiatkowskiDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Irene MathijssenDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Rene van der HulstDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe use of autologous fat transfer (AFT) or lipofilling for correcting contour deformities is seen as one of the major breakthroughs in reconstructive plastic surgery. Its applications in facial reconstructive surgery have been of particular interest owing to the prospect of achieving autologous reconstruction by a minimally invasive approach. However, its unpredictability and variable degree of resorption have limited its utility and much skepticism still exists regarding its efficacy. Furthermore, more than 2 decades of clinical research have produced a highly fragmented body of evidence that has not been able to provide definite answers.

objectiveTo investigate the safety and efficacy of AFT in facial reconstruction through a systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to October 11, 2017. STUDY SELECTION: All published studies investigating the efficacy and safety of AFT in facial reconstructive surgery. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers performed data extraction systematically, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Summary measures were pooled in a random-effects model meta-analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The patient and surgeon satisfaction, graft survival, number of AFT sessions, and the incidence of AFT-related complications were the main outcomes of interest in this meta-analysis.

resultsThis systematic review resulted in the inclusion 52 relevant studies consisting of 1568 unique patients. These included 4 randomized clinical trials, 11 cohort studies, and 37 case series. The overall follow-up averaged 1.3 years after AFT. Meta-analysis revealed a very high overall patient satisfaction rate of 91.1% (95% CI, 85.1%-94.8%) and overall surgeon satisfaction rate of 88.6% (95% CI, 83.4%-92.4%). The number of AFT sessions required to achieve the desired result was 1.5 (95% CI, 1.3-1.7) and 50% to 60% of the injected volume was retained at 1 year. Only 4.8% (95% CI, 3.3%-6.9%) of procedures resulted in clinical complications. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: To our knowledge, this study provides the first overview of the current knowledge about AFT in facial reconstructive surgery. Our results confirm that AFT is an effective technique for treating soft-tissue deformities in the head and neck, with low rate of minor complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.

Indexed as

Cosmetic TechniquesAdipose TissueFaceGraft SurvivalHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPatient SatisfactionPlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTransplantation, AutologousTreatment OutcomeVisual Analog Scale

Identifiers

PMID29596574
PMCPMC5876814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.