Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29596526›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

ABO blood groups as a prognostic factor for recurrence in ovarian and vulvar cancer.

Céline Montavon Sartorius, Andreas Schoetzau, Henriette Kettelhack, Daniel Fink, Neville F Hacker, André Fedier, Francis Jacob, Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Study of Association of ABO and Rh Blood Group with Colorectal Cancer in Khuzestan Province, Iran.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cancer Cell Glycocalyx and Its Significance in Cancer Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Céline Montavon SartoriusDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Hospital for Women, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Andreas SchoetzauOvarian Cancer Research, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Henriette KettelhackOvarian Cancer Research, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniel FinkDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Neville F HackerGynaecological Cancer Center, Royal Hospital for Women, School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
André FedierOvarian Cancer Research, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Francis JacobOvarian Cancer Research, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0446-1942
Viola Heinzelmann-SchwarzDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Hospital for Women, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel · CHRoyal Hospital for Women · AUUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between ABO blood groups (BG) and risk of incidence in cancers including gynecological cancers has been widely studied, showing increased incidence risk for BG A patients. As available data are inconsistent we investigated whether BG and their anti-glycan antibodies (anti-A and anti-B) have prognostic values in gynecological cancers. We retrospectively evaluated 974 patients with gynecological cancers in three cancer centers (Switzerland and Australia) between 1974 and 2014 regarding the relationships between clinico-pathological findings and the BG. Time to disease recurrence was significantly influenced by BG in patients with ovarian (n = 282) and vulvar (n = 67) cancer. BG O or B patients showed a significantly increased risk for ovarian cancer relapse compared to A, 59% and 82%, respectively (p = 0.045; HR O vs A = 1.59 (CI 1.01-2.51) and (p = 0.036; HR A vs B = 0.55 (CI 0.32-0.96). Median time to relapse for advanced stage (n = 126) ovarian cancer patients was 18.2 months for BG O and 32.2 for A (p = 0.031; HR O vs A = 2.07 (CI 1.07-4.02)). BG also significantly influenced relapse-free survival in patients with vulvar cancer (p = 0.002), with BG O tending to have increased relapse risk compared to A (p = 0.089). Blood groups hence associate with recurrence in ovarian and vulvar cancer: women with BG O seem to have a lower ovarian cancer incidence, however are more likely to relapse earlier. The significance of the BG status as a prognostic value is evident and may be helpful to oncologists in prognosticating disease outcome and selecting the appropriate therapy.

Indexed as

ABO Blood-Group SystemAdenocarcinomaAustraliaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateVulvar NeoplasmsABO Blood-Group System

Identifiers

PMID29596526
PMCPMC5875852
OpenAlexW2795319255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.