Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29596475›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Sensitivity of different MRI sequences in the early detection of melanoma brain metastases.

Katerina Deike-Hofmann, Daniel Thünemann, Michael O Breckwoldt, Daniel Schwarz, Alexander Radbruch, Alexander Enk, Martin Bendszus, Jessica Hassel, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Philipp Bäumer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The Role and Potential ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. What to Trust, PSA or [Research and reports in urology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katerina Deike-HofmannDepartment of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4319-0428
Daniel ThünemannDepartment of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael O BreckwoldtDepartment of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniel SchwarzDepartment of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexander RadbruchDepartment of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexander EnkDepartment of Dermatology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, NCT, University of Heidelberg Medical Center Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin BendszusDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jessica HasselDepartment of Dermatology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, NCT, University of Heidelberg Medical Center Heidelberg, Germany.
Heinz-Peter SchlemmerDepartment of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.
Philipp BäumerDepartment of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2896-543X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter the emergence of new MRI techniques such as susceptibility- and diffusion-weighted imaging (SWI and DWI) and because of specific imaging characteristics of melanoma brain metastases (MBM), it is unclear which MRI sequences are most beneficial for detection of MBM. This study was performed to investigate the sensitivity of six clinical MRI sequences in the early detection of MBM.

methodsMedical records of all melanoma patients referred to our center between November 2005 and December 2016 were reviewed for presence of MBM. Analysis encompassed six MRI sequences at the time of initial diagnosis of first or new MBM, including non-enhanced T1-weighted (T1w), contrast-enhanced T1w (ceT1w), T2-weighted (T2w), T2w-FLAIR, susceptibility-weighted (SWI) and diffusion-weighted (DWI) MRI. Each lesion was rated with respect to its conspicuity (score from 0-not detectable to 3-clearly visible).

resultsOf 1210 patients, 217 with MBM were included in the analysis and up to 5 lesions per patient were evaluated. A total of 720 metastases were assessed and all six sequences were available for 425 MBM. Sensitivity (conspicuity ≥2) was 99.7% for ceT1w, 77.0% for FLAIR, 64.7% for SWI, 61.0% for T2w, 56.7% for T1w, and 48.4% for DWI. Thirty-one (7.3%) of 425 lesions were only detectable by ceT1w but no other sequence.

conclusionsContrast-enhanced T1-weighting is more sensitive than all other sequences for detection of MBM. Disruption of the blood-brain-barrier is consistently an earlier sign in MBM than perifocal edema, signal loss on SWI or diffusion restriction.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsContrast MediaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID29596475
PMCPMC5875773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.