Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29596421›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2018

Asgard archaea are the closest prokaryotic relatives of eukaryotes.

Anja Spang, Laura Eme, Jimmy H Saw, Eva F Caceres, Katarzyna Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka, Jonathan Lombard, Lionel Guy, Thijs J G Ettema

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Applying the Classic Test dN/dS to Detect Selection in Archaea.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Archaeal hemeFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Asgard archaea in saline environments.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2022
    Review
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anja SpangDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Laura EmeDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jimmy H SawDepartment of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Eva F CaceresDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Katarzyna Zaremba-NiedzwiedzkaDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jonathan LombardDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lionel GuyDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Thijs J G EttemaDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6898-6377

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ArchaeaEukaryotaEuryarchaeotaGenome, ArchaealProkaryotic Cells

Identifiers

PMID29596421
PMCPMC5875740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.