Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29596359›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Advances in Materials for Recent Low-Profile Implantable Bioelectronics.

Yanfei Chen, Yun-Soung Kim, Bryan W Tillman, Woon-Hong Yeo, Youngjae Chun

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Video-Capable Ultrasonic Wireless Communications Through Biological Tissues.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Wireless, battery-free subdermally implantable photometry systems for chronic recording of neural dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yanfei ChenDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. yanfeichen@pitt.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0944-222X
Yun-Soung KimGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA. ysk@me.gatech.edu.
Bryan W TillmanDivision of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. tillmanbw@upmc.edu.
Woon-Hong YeoGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA. whyeo@gatech.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5526-3882
Youngjae ChunDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. yjchun@pitt.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of micro/nanofabrication technologies to engineer a variety of materials has enabled new types of bioelectronics for health monitoring and disease diagnostics. In this review, we summarize widely used electronic materials in recent low-profile implantable systems, including traditional metals and semiconductors, soft polymers, biodegradable metals, and organic materials. Silicon-based compounds have represented the traditional materials in medical devices, due to the fully established fabrication processes. Examples include miniaturized sensors for monitoring intraocular pressure and blood pressure, which are designed in an ultra-thin diaphragm to react with the applied pressure. These sensors are integrated into rigid circuits and multiple modules; this brings challenges regarding the fundamental material's property mismatch with the targeted human tissues, which are intrinsically soft. Therefore, many polymeric materials have been investigated for hybrid integration with well-characterized functional materials such as silicon membranes and metal interconnects, which enable soft implantable bioelectronics. The most recent trend in implantable systems uses transient materials that naturally dissolve in body fluid after a programmed lifetime. Such biodegradable metallic materials are advantageous in the design of electronics due to their proven electrical properties. Collectively, this review delivers the development history of materials in implantable devices, while introducing new bioelectronics based on bioresorbable materials with multiple functionalities.

Indexed as

biodegradable materialsimplantable materialslow-profile bioelectronicsmedical devicesmicro/nanofabricationminiaturization

Identifiers

PMID29596359
PMCPMC5951368
OpenAlexW2794954076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.