Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29596036›Full record

ArticlePopulation health management2018

Provider Perspectives on the Collection of Social Determinants of Health.

Ana Palacio, David Seo, Heidy Medina, Vivek Singh, Maritza Suarez, Leonardo Tamariz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Population health management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Community Perceptions of Health Equity: A Qualitative Study.Journal of primary care & community health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana Palacio1 Division of Population Health and Computational Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami , Miami, Florida.
David Seo1 Division of Population Health and Computational Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami , Miami, Florida.
Heidy Medina1 Division of Population Health and Computational Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami , Miami, Florida.
Vivek Singh1 Division of Population Health and Computational Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami , Miami, Florida.
Maritza Suarez1 Division of Population Health and Computational Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami , Miami, Florida.
Leonardo Tamariz1 Division of Population Health and Computational Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami , Miami, Florida.

Funding

Miami Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002736 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CARRASQUILLO, OLVEEN, KOBETZ, ERIN N · 2018 to 2022
$23.2M
Training and Mentoring CoreU54MD010722 · NIMHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI COX, NANCY J · 2016 to 2020
$11.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002736NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD010722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social determinants of health (SDH) impact health outcomes. Medical centers have begun to collect SDH data, urged by government and scientific entities. Provider perspectives on collecting SDH are unknown. The aim is to understand differences in views and preferences according to provider characteristics. A cross-sectional survey of University of Miami clinical faculty was conducted in late 2016. The survey contained 11 questions: 8 demographic and departmental responsibilities questions and 3 Likert scale questions to capture collection and use of SDH perspectives. The main outcome was whether providers thought the benefit of collecting SDH outweighs the burden and risks. In all, 240 faculty members were included. The majority were men (64%), with a mean age of 51 years. Among participants, 53.5% were non-Hispanic white, 32% were Hispanic, 5% were Black/African American, and 5% were Asian. The majority agreed that SDH are important predictors of health outcomes and quality of care (83%). When comparing minority to nonminority faculty, 25% believed that SDH should only be available to PCPs, compared to 8% of nonminorities (P < 0.01). In a multivariate model, belonging to a racial ethnic minority was the only characteristic associated with believing that benefits of collecting SDH outweigh the risks (odds ratio 1.87, 95% confidence interval 1.02- 3.5) after adjusting for age, sex, minority status, health care provider type, type of responsibilities, and department. This study reveals that although most providers of a health system believe social risks impact health outcomes and quality metrics, the buy-in to collect SDH varies according to the racial/ethnic composition of the faculty.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelData CollectionSocial Determinants of HealthCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMalePhysiciansSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcomeelectronic medical record integrationhealth outcomesquality metricssocial determinants of healthsocial risks

Identifiers

PMID29596036
PMCPMC6425987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.