Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29595662›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2018

Difference between elderly and non-elderly patients in using serum lactate level to predict mortality caused by sepsis in the emergency department.

Hsien-Hung Cheng, Fu-Cheng Chen, Meng-Wei Change, Chia-Te Kung, Chi-Yung Cheng, Tsung-Cheng Tsai, Sheng-Yuan Hsiao, Chih-Min Su

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. The Global Burden of Sepsis and Septic Shock.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bloodstream infections in the elderly: what is the real goal?Aging clinical and experimental research · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hsien-Hung ChengDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Fu-Cheng Chen
Meng-Wei Change
Chia-Te Kung
Chi-Yung Cheng
Tsung-Cheng Tsai
Sheng-Yuan Hsiao
Chih-Min Su
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elderly people are more susceptible to sepsis and experience more comorbidities and complications than young adults. Serum lactate is a useful biomarker to predict mortality in patients with sepsis. Lactate production is affected by the severity of sepsis, organ dysfunction, and adrenergic stimulation. Whether the predictive ability of serum lactate will be different between non-elderly and elderly patients is unknown.A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the prognostic value of hyperlactatemia in predicting the mortality between elderly (≥65 years) and non-elderly (<65 years) patients with sepsis.This is a single-center retrospective observational cohort study conducted from January 2007 to December 2013 in southern Taiwan. All patients with sepsis, who used antibiotics, with blood culture collected, and with available serum lactate levels in the emergency department, were included in the analysis. We evaluated the difference in serum lactate level between the elderly and non-elderly septic patients by using multiple regression models.A total of 7087 patients were enrolled in the study. Elderly and non-elderly patients accounted for 62.3% (4414) and 40.2% (2673) of all patients, respectively. Statistically significant difference of serum lactate levels was not observed between elderly and non-elderly survivors (2.9 vs 3.0 mmol/L; P = .57); however, elderly patients had lower lactate levels than those within the 28-day in-hospital mortality (5.5 vs 6.6 mmol/L, P < .01). Multiple logistic regression revealed higher adjusted mortality risk in elderly and non-elderly patients with lactate levels of ≥4.0 mmol/L (odds ratio [OR], 4.98 and 5.82; P < .01, respectively), and lactate level between 2 and 4 mmol/L (OR, 1.57 and 1.99; P < .01, respectively) compared to that in the reference group with lactate levels of <2.0 mmol/L in each group. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, sensitivity rates for predicting mortality were 0.80 and 0.77 for non-elderly and elderly patients, respectively, by using serum lactate levels higher than 2.0 mmol/L.Septic elderly non-survivors had 1 mmol/L lower serum lactate level than those of the non-elderly non-survivors. Lactate >2 mmol/L still could provide enough sensitivity in predicting sepsis mortality in elder patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersBlood CultureComorbidityEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospital MortalityHumansLactic AcidMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersLactic Acid

Identifiers

PMID29595662
PMCPMC5895436
OpenAlexW2794743996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.