Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29595657›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2018

Analysis of epidural waveform for cervical epidural steroid injections confirmed with fluoroscopy.

Ji H Hong, Sung W Jung

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07217457 (Epidural Wave Form Analysis vs Fluoroscopic Guidance for Thoracic Epidural Placement), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07217457 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Epidural Wave Form Analysis vs Fluoroscopic Guidance for Thoracic Epidural Placement

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2025 to 2026Enrolled160ConditionsEpidural PlacementArmsEpidural Waveform Analysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ji H HongDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Department of Psychiatry, Keimyung University DongSan Hospital, DaeGu, Korea.
Sung W Jung

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of epidural space with loss of resistance (LOR) is commonly performed. But it lacks specificity. Epidural pressure waveform analysis (EPWA) provides a simple confirmative adjunct for LOR. If the needle is located within the epidural space, measurement of the pressure at its tips shows a pulsatile waveform. Previous studies demonstrated satisfactory sensitivity and specificity of EPWA. However, success or failure of epidural injection was confirmed by the pinprick test, which is limited for patients in the setting of the pain clinic. In this study, we evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values of EPWA for cervical epidural steroid injection (CESI) confirmed by fluoroscopy.One hundred and five CESIs of 75 patients suffering from neck and radicular arm pain of over 3 months duration were enrolled. The physician injected 5 mL of normal saline after a feeling of satisfactory LOR. Saline filled extension tubing, connected to a pressure transducer, was attached to the needle. A 3 mL bolus of contrast medium was injected to confirm the success of CESI.The incorrect identification of epidural space with LOR (false LOR) was 29.5%. Of these 31 failed CESIs, 2 showed epidural waveform and 29 did not. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of EPWA was 94.5%, 93.5%, 97.2%, and 87.7%, respectively.EPWA shows satisfactory reliability and is a simple adjunct to decrease false LOR for CESI. Further confirmative studies are required before its routine use in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeAdultAgedChronic PainEpidural SpaceFemaleFluoroscopyHumansInjections, EpiduralMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTransducers, Pressure

Identifiers

PMID29595657
PMCPMC5895410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.