Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29595471›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Live cell-lineage tracing and machine learning reveal patterns of organ regeneration.

Oriol Viader-Llargués, Valerio Lupperger, Laura Pola-Morell, Carsten Marr, Hernán López-Schier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Machine Learning in Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cell Tracking for Organoids: Lessons From Developmental Biology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oriol Viader-LlarguésUnit Sensory Biology & Organogenesis, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Valerio LuppergerInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Laura Pola-MorellUnit Sensory Biology & Organogenesis, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Carsten MarrInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Hernán López-SchierUnit Sensory Biology & Organogenesis, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7925-7439

Funding

European Research Council 2007_205095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the intrinsically stochastic nature of damage, sensory organs recapitulate normal architecture during repair to maintain function. Here we present a quantitative approach that combines live cell-lineage tracing and multifactorial classification by machine learning to reveal how cell identity and localization are coordinated during organ regeneration. We use the superficial neuromasts in larval zebrafish, which contain three cell classes organized in radial symmetry and a single planar-polarity axis. Visualization of cell-fate transitions at high temporal resolution shows that neuromasts regenerate isotropically to recover geometric order, proportions and polarity with exceptional accuracy. We identify mediolateral position within the growing tissue as the best predictor of cell-fate acquisition. We propose a self-regulatory mechanism that guides the regenerative process to identical outcome with minimal extrinsic information. The integrated approach that we have developed is simple and broadly applicable, and should help define predictive signatures of cellular behavior during the construction of complex tissues.

Indexed as

RegenerationAnimalsCell LineageIntravital MicroscopyLarvaMachine LearningMechanoreceptorsMicroscopy, VideoZebrafishclonal analysisdevelopmental biologylive imagingmachine learningneuromastregenerationsensory organstem cellszebrafish

Identifiers

PMID29595471
PMCPMC5903862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.