ArticleCancer biology & therapy2018
Association between genetic variants in p53 binding sites and risks of osteosarcoma in a Chinese population: a two-stage case-control study.
Article in Cancer biology & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Epidemiological Evidence for Associations Between Genetic Variants and Osteosarcoma Susceptibility: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteosarcoma (OS) is one of the most common bone malignancies in children and adolescents. To date, inaugural mechanism of OS was considered as a complex process and was still not clear. The p53 gene, most important tumor suppressors, was associated with risk of many tumors, including OS. In current study, we evaluated the relationship between genetic variation of the p53 binding site and the OS susceptibility through a two-stage case-control study in Chinese population. We found that rs1295925 (OR = 0.85; 95 CI = 0.76-0.94; P = 0.003) and rs3787547 (OR = 1.27; 95 CI = 1.11-1.45; P = 4.0 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.