ArticleQuarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)2019
Positive-blank versus negative-blank feedback learning in children and adults.
Article in Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Promoting motivation and reducing stress in medical students by utilizing self-determination theory - a randomized controlled trial in practical psychiatry courses.BMC medical education · 2024Trial
- Conditions under which college students cease learning.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Uncertainty-driven regulation of learning and exploration in adolescents: A computational account.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In positive-blank feedback learning, positive feedback is given to a correct response whereas blank feedback is given to an incorrect response. Conversely, in negative-blank feedback learning, blank feedback is given to a correct response and negative feedback to an incorrect response. As blank feedback might be subjectively interpreted as signalling a correct response, negative-blank feedback might be more informative than positive-blank feedback, and thus may result in better performance. However, positive-blank feedback might also be superior as it motivates the learner in lengthy tasks. These "information" and "motivation" accounts were tested in a two-block feedback learning paradigm. In the first block, that is, when the task duration was still short, children but not adults profited more from negative than from positive feedback. The results in children thus support the information account. In the second block, that is, when the task duration had become longer, children and adults profited more from positive feedback, thereby supporting the motivation account. Results are discussed in light of behavioural and neuroscientific theories on feedback learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.