ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2018
CT and MR imaging characteristics of histological subtypes of head and neck ossifying fibroma.
Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extensive ossifying fibroma of the mandible: segmental resection and free fibula flap reconstruction.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Mandibular Cemento‑ossifying Fibroma.Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology · 2025Article
- CT and MR imaging findings of head and neck chondrosarcoma.Oral radiology · 2024Article
- A practical overview of CT and MRI features of developmental, inflammatory, and neoplastic lesions of the sphenoid body and clivus.Neuroradiology · 2022Review
- Spheno-orbital juvenile psammomatoid ossifying fibroma: a case report and literature review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021Review
- Bone-related disorders of the jaw: A clinico-radiological diagnostic algorithm.The neuroradiology journal · 2021Article
- Benign Fibro-Osseous Lesions of the Head and Neck.Head and neck pathology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe current study aimed to assess CT and MRI characteristics of histological subtypes of head and neck ossifying fibroma (OF).
methods12 patients with histopathologically-proven head and neck OF were included in this study. Lesions were pathologically classified into three histological subtypes: eight cement-OFs (COFs), three juvenile psammomatoid OFs (JPOFs), and one juvenile trabecular OF (JTOF). All patients underwent CT examination, while seven also underwent MRI. Imaging characteristics were retrospectively assessed.
resultsOn CT images, the lesion margins were well-defined in nine patients (75%) (seven COFs and two JPOFs), partially ill-defined in two (17%) (one COF and one JTOF), and ill-defined in one (8%) (one JPOF). The continuity of the eroded overlying bone cortex was maintained in nine patients (75%) (seven COFs and two JPOFs) but disrupted in three (25%) (one COF, one JPOF, one JTOF). With respect to lesion density, homogeneous ground-glass opacity was observed in five patients (42%) (five COFs), target-like appearance in three (25%) (two COFs, one JPOF), and mixture of hyper- and hypodense areas were observed in four (33%) (one COF, two JPOFs, one JTOF). MR signal intensity was homogeneous in two patients (29%) (two COFs) and heterogeneous in five (71%) (two COFs, two JPOFs, one JTOF).
conclusionsCOFs tended to exhibit well-defined margins and preserved continuity of the overlying bone cortex. COFs were usually homogeneous, whereas JPOFs and JTOF were always heterogeneous. Target-like appearance was one of the characteristics of OFs, but it was observed in both COF and JPOF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.