Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29595298›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2018

Decision-making and socioeconomic disparities in colonoscopy screening in African Americans.

Marc T Kiviniemi, Lynne B Klasko-Foster, Deborah O Erwin, Lina Jandorf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Shared Decision Making in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marc T KiviniemiDepartment of Community and Health Behavior.
Lynne B Klasko-FosterDepartment of Community and Health Behavior.
Deborah O ErwinOffice of Cancer Health Disparities Research, Roswell Park Cancer Institute.
Lina JandorfDepartment of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

Funding

CRC Screening Thoughts and Feelings: Increasing Engagement of African AmericansR01CA171935 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI ERWIN, DEBORAH O, JANDORF, LINA · 2013 to 2016
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA171935Roswell Park Cancer Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocioeconomic status (SES) disparities in colorectal cancer screening are persistent. Lower education and income are both associated with lower screening rates. Both cognitive (e.g., perceived barriers) and affective (e.g., disgust, fear) decision-making constructs are known determinants of colorectal cancer screening behavior. This study tests the hypotheses that SES may be related to decision-making constructs and that this SES-decision-making construct relation may contribute to explaining the SES-screening behavior disparity.

methodSurveys assessing perceived benefits and barriers to screening, self-efficacy, positive and negative affective associations with colonoscopy, fear of colonoscopy, colorectal cancer knowledge, past screening behavior, and demographics including education and income were completed by 2,015 African American participants ages 50 and older. Both univariable and multivariable relations of SES to decision-making constructs were examined, as were univariable and multivariable models of the indirect effect of SES on screening via decision-making constructs.

resultsSocioeconomic status was related to both screening compliance and the decision-making constructs. Bootstrap modeling of the indirect effect showed that the total effect of the SES-screening behavior relation included an indirect effect via social cognitive decision-making constructs.

conclusionThese findings suggest that cognitive and affective decision-making constructs account for at least some of the SES disparities in colorectal cancer screening behavior. As such, more research is needed to explore the intra individual-level influences of disparities in colorectal cancer screening. In addition, work is needed to develop effective intervention approaches to address the relation of SES to decision-making constructs. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

AgedBlack or African AmericanColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsDecision MakingEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMaleMass ScreeningSocial Class

Identifiers

PMID29595298
PMCPMC5920714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.