Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29595090›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc2018

A post-infection serologic assessment of cattle herd immune status after a vesicular stomatitis outbreak and the agreement of antibody assays.

Mary Lou Berninger, Emily O'Hearn, Richanne Lomkin, Ken Newens, Karyn A Havas

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Lou BerningerNational Veterinary Services Laboratories, Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Veterinary Services, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Greenport, NY (Berninger, O'Hearn, Havas).
Emily O'HearnNational Veterinary Services Laboratories, Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Veterinary Services, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Greenport, NY (Berninger, O'Hearn, Havas).
Richanne LomkinNational Veterinary Services Laboratories, Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Veterinary Services, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Greenport, NY (Berninger, O'Hearn, Havas).
Ken NewensNational Veterinary Services Laboratories, Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Veterinary Services, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Greenport, NY (Berninger, O'Hearn, Havas).
Karyn A HavasNational Veterinary Services Laboratories, Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Veterinary Services, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Greenport, NY (Berninger, O'Hearn, Havas).
Cornell University · USAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vesicular stomatitis (VS) is a vesicular disease of horses, cattle, and pigs in the Western Hemisphere caused by viruses in the genus Vesiculovirus. Disease manifests as vesicles and erosions on the oral mucosa, teats, prepuce, and coronary band, and is similar in presentation to foot-and-mouth disease. Laboratory confirmation is therefore required. Conventional assays include competitive (c)ELISA and complement fixation (CF). The cELISA provides more accurate herd-level detection of VSV-exposed cattle, but may lack the ability to capture fluctuating antibody levels in individual animals. The CF assay can confirm newly infected animals because of its ability to detect antigen-antibody complexes, thus is considered to be indicative of IgM. We evaluated the immune status of 2 herds affected by VSV in 2014 by testing sera collected in June 2015. Two conventional assays were compared to a novel IgM-IgG ELISA. When sampled in 2015, both herds had detectable VSV-specific antibodies; 18% and 36% of animals tested by cELISA and 2% and 8% of animals tested by CF were positive. The novel IgM-IgG assay exhibited fair agreement (adjusted kappa score of 48) with the conventional assays, and should be evaluated further to assess its ability to replace the 2 separate assays with a single assay system, or for its ability to replace the CF assay as a more sensitive method for defining newly exposed animals.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ViralBiological AssayCattleCattle DiseasesColoradoDisease OutbreaksEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleMaleSeroepidemiologic StudiesVesicular StomatitisVesiculovirusAntibodies, ViralCattlehumoral immune responseserologyvesicular stomatitis

Identifiers

PMID29595090
PMCPMC6505922
OpenAlexW2795128330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.