Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29595089›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc2018

Mistaken identity of an open reading frame proposed for PCR-based identification of Mycoplasma bovis and the effect of polymorphisms and insertions on assay performance.

Karen B Register, William D Boatwright, Karen M Gesy, Tyler C Thacker, Murray D Jelinski

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Investigation of Macrolide Resistance Genotypes inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen B RegisterRuminant Diseases and Immunology Research Unit (Register, Boatwright), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA.
William D BoatwrightRuminant Diseases and Immunology Research Unit (Register, Boatwright), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA.
Karen M GesyRuminant Diseases and Immunology Research Unit (Register, Boatwright), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA.
Tyler C ThackerRuminant Diseases and Immunology Research Unit (Register, Boatwright), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA.
Murray D JelinskiRuminant Diseases and Immunology Research Unit (Register, Boatwright), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA.
National Animal Disease Center · USUniversity of Saskatchewan · CAAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycoplasma bovis is an important cause of disease in cattle and bison. Because the bacterium requires specialized growth conditions, many diagnostic laboratories routinely use PCR to replace or complement conventional isolation and identification methods. A frequently used target of such assays is the uvrC gene, which has been shown to be highly conserved among isolates. We discovered that a previously described PCR putatively targeting the uvrC gene amplifies a fragment from an adjacent gene predicted to encode a lipoprotein. Comparison of the lipoprotein gene sequence from 211 isolates revealed several single nucleotide polymorphisms, 1 of which falls within a primer-binding sequence. Additionally, 3 isolates from this group were found to have a 1,658-bp transposase gene insertion within the amplified region that leads to a false-negative result. The insertion was not detected in a further 164 isolates. We found no evidence that the nucleotide substitution within the primer-binding region affects the assay sensitivity, performance, or limit of detection. Nonetheless, laboratories utilizing this method for identification of M. bovis should be aware that the region amplified may be prone to nucleotide substitutions and/or insertions relative to the sequence used for its design and that occasional false-negative results may be obtained.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesConserved SequenceFalse Negative ReactionsMycoplasma bovisMycoplasma InfectionsOpen Reading FramesPolymerase Chain ReactionSpecies SpecificityMycoplasma bovisPCRuvrC gene

Identifiers

PMID29595089
PMCPMC6505919
OpenAlexW2794790004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.