ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2018
Accurately Predicting Disordered Regions of Proteins Using Rosetta ResidueDisorder Application.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tutorial: a guide for the selection of fast and accurate computational tools for the prediction of intrinsic disorder in proteins.Nature protocols · 2023Review
- Predicting ion mobility collision cross sections using projection approximation with ROSIE-PARCS webserver.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Recent Advances in NMR Protein Structure Prediction with ROSETTA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Ab Initio Modelling of the Structure of ToxA-like and MAX Fungal Effector Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Investigating In Situ Expression of c-MYC and Candidate Ubiquitin-Specific Proteases in DLBCL and Assessment for Peptidyl Disruptor Molecule against c-MYC-USP37 Complex.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Protein shape sampled by ion mobility mass spectrometry consistently improves protein structure prediction.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Computational Structure Prediction for Antibody-Antigen Complexes From Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry: Challenges and Outlook.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Predicting Protein Conformational Disorder and Disordered Binding Sites.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Predicting substitutions to modulate disorder and stability in coiled-coils.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- A Unified De Novo Approach for Predicting the Structures of Ordered and Disordered Proteins.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2020Article
- Predicting Protein Complex Structure from Surface-Induced Dissociation Mass Spectrometry Data.ACS central science · 2019Article
- Measuring Intrinsic Disorder and Tracking Conformational Transitions Using Rosetta ResidueDisorder.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although many proteins necessitate well-folded structures to properly instigate their biological functions, a large fraction of functioning proteins contain regions-known as intrinsically disordered protein regions-where stable structures are not likely to form. Notable functional roles of intrinsically disordered proteins are in transcriptional regulation, translation, and cellular signal transduction. Moreover, intrinsically disordered protein regions are highly abundant in many proteins associated with various human diseases, therefore these segments have become attractive drug targets for potential therapeutics. Over the past decades, numerous computational methods have been developed to accurately predict disordered regions of proteins. Here we introduce a user-friendly and reliable approach for the prediction of disordered protein regions using the structure prediction software Rosetta. Using 245 proteins from a benchmark data set (16 DisProt database proteins) and a test data set (229 proteins with NMR data), we use Rosetta to predict the global protein structures and then show that there is a statistically significant difference between Rosetta scores in disordered and ordered regions, with scores being less favorable in disordered regions. Furthermore, the difference in scores between ordered and disordered protein regions is sufficient to accurately identify disordered protein regions. As a result, our Rosetta ResidueDisorder method (benchmark data set prediction accuracy of 71.77% and independent test data set prediction accuracy of 65.37%) outperformed other established disorder prediction tools and did not exhibit a biased prediction toward either ordered or disordered regions. To facilitate usage, a Rosetta application has been developed for the Rosetta ResidueDisorder method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.