Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29595057›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2018

Accurately Predicting Disordered Regions of Proteins Using Rosetta ResidueDisorder Application.

Stephanie S Kim, Justin T Seffernick, Steffen Lindert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Recent Advances in NMR Protein Structure Prediction with ROSETTA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Predicting Protein Conformational Disorder and Disordered Binding Sites.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie S KimDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry , Ohio State University , Columbus , Ohio 43210 , United States.
Justin T SeffernickDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry , Ohio State University , Columbus , Ohio 43210 , United States.
Steffen LindertDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry , Ohio State University , Columbus , Ohio 43210 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3976-3473
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Molecular models to characterize actions of calcium sensitizing drugsR01HL137015 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LINDERT, STEFFEN · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Rational Drug Design for Chronic Neuronal DamageR03AG054904 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LINDERT, STEFFEN · 2017 to 2018
$155k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL137015NIA NIH HHS R03 AG054904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although many proteins necessitate well-folded structures to properly instigate their biological functions, a large fraction of functioning proteins contain regions-known as intrinsically disordered protein regions-where stable structures are not likely to form. Notable functional roles of intrinsically disordered proteins are in transcriptional regulation, translation, and cellular signal transduction. Moreover, intrinsically disordered protein regions are highly abundant in many proteins associated with various human diseases, therefore these segments have become attractive drug targets for potential therapeutics. Over the past decades, numerous computational methods have been developed to accurately predict disordered regions of proteins. Here we introduce a user-friendly and reliable approach for the prediction of disordered protein regions using the structure prediction software Rosetta. Using 245 proteins from a benchmark data set (16 DisProt database proteins) and a test data set (229 proteins with NMR data), we use Rosetta to predict the global protein structures and then show that there is a statistically significant difference between Rosetta scores in disordered and ordered regions, with scores being less favorable in disordered regions. Furthermore, the difference in scores between ordered and disordered protein regions is sufficient to accurately identify disordered protein regions. As a result, our Rosetta ResidueDisorder method (benchmark data set prediction accuracy of 71.77% and independent test data set prediction accuracy of 65.37%) outperformed other established disorder prediction tools and did not exhibit a biased prediction toward either ordered or disordered regions. To facilitate usage, a Rosetta application has been developed for the Rosetta ResidueDisorder method.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingSoftwareHumansIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsModels, MolecularNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularIntrinsically Disordered Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29595057
PMCPMC5897131
OpenAlexW2794825320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.