Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29594924›Full record

ArticleThe European physical journal. E, Soft matter2018

Hydrodynamic interaction of a self-propelling particle with a wall : Comparison between an active Janus particle and a squirmer model.

Zaiyi Shen, Alois Würger, Juho S Lintuvuori

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European physical journal. E, Soft matter, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Self-propulsion in 2D confinement: phoretic and hydrodynamic interactions.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2021
    Article
  5. Active colloids under geometrical constraints in viscoelastic media.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Topical Issue on Fluids and Structures: Multi-scale coupling and modeling.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zaiyi ShenUniv. Bordeaux, CNRS, LOMA, UMR 5798, F-33405, Talence, France.
Alois WürgerUniv. Bordeaux, CNRS, LOMA, UMR 5798, F-33405, Talence, France.
Juho S LintuvuoriUniv. Bordeaux, CNRS, LOMA, UMR 5798, F-33405, Talence, France. juho.lintuvuori@u-bordeaux.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using lattice Boltzmann simulations we study the hydrodynamics of an active spherical particle near a no-slip wall. We develop a computational model for an active Janus particle, by considering different and independent mobilities on the two hemispheres and compare the behaviour to a standard squirmer model. We show that the topology of the far-field hydrodynamic nature of the active Janus particle is similar to the standard squirmer model, but in the near-field the hydrodynamics differ. In order to study how the near-field effects affect the interaction between the particle and a flat wall, we compare the behaviour of a Janus swimmer and a squirmer near a no-slip surface via extensive numerical simulations. Our results show generally a good agreement between these two models, but they reveal some key differences especially with low magnitudes of the squirming parameter [Formula: see text]. Notably the affinity of the particles to be trapped at a surface is increased for the active Janus particles when compared to standard squirmers. Finally, we find that when the particle is trapped on the surface, the velocity parallel to the surface exceeds the bulk swimming speed and scales linearly with [Formula: see text].

Indexed as

Topical issue: Fluids and Structures: Multi-scale coupling and modeling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.