Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29594846›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2018

Prevalence and spatial distribution of Ixodid tick populations in the forest fringes of Western Ghats reported with human cases of Kyasanur forest disease and monkey deaths in South India.

C Sadanandane, M D Gokhale, A Elango, P Yadav, D T Mourya, P Jambulingam

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transient receptor potential channels inChannels (Austin, Tex.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Ocular Manifestations of Flavivirus Infections.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C SadanandaneVector Control Research Centre (Indian Council of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India), Indira Nagar, Pondicherry, 605 006, India.
M D GokhaleNational Institute of Virology (Indian Council of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India), Pune, Maharashtra, 411 001, India.
A ElangoVector Control Research Centre (Indian Council of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India), Indira Nagar, Pondicherry, 605 006, India. elangoar@yahoo.co.in.
P YadavNational Institute of Virology (Indian Council of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India), Pune, Maharashtra, 411 001, India.
D T MouryaNational Institute of Virology (Indian Council of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India), Pune, Maharashtra, 411 001, India.
P JambulingamVector Control Research Centre (Indian Council of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India), Indira Nagar, Pondicherry, 605 006, India.
Government of India · INICMR-National Institute of Virology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kyasanur forest disease (KFD) is a major tick-borne viral haemorrhagic fever caused by KFD virus (KFDV) (Flaviviridae). The disease was reported to be confined to five districts of Karnataka state India until 2011. During 2012-2016, emergence of KFD has been reported in newer areas of Karnataka and adjoining states. Therefore, survey of tick vectors was carried out in these new areas of Karnataka and adjoining states reported with monkey deaths and human cases of KFD. In all selected sites, ticks from the forest floor were collected by lint clothes using flagging method. Tick samples were tested for KFDV nucleic acid by real-time RT-PCR. A total of 4772 ticks, comprising eight species of genus Haemaphysalis and one species each of genus Amblyomma, Ixodes and Rhipicephalus was collected. Haemaphysalis spinigera, the principal vector of KFDV was the predominant tick species (59.5%) collected followed by H. turturis (8.6%). The abundance of H. spinigera ranged from 9.2 to 33.9 per man-hour in the six districts surveyed. Of 214 (4418 tick samples) pools screened by real-time RT-PCR, two pools of H. spinigera were positive for KFDV. High abundance of Haemaphysalis vectors in the six districts indicated that the districts are receptive for KFD outbreaks. KFDV was detected in the tick vectors in the new foci of the KFD. Data on tick distribution will be useful in creating KFD risk map for strengthening the ongoing preventive measures such as vaccination and supply of insect repellents to the high risk groups and intensive health education.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionAnimalsArachnid VectorsBiodiversityEncephalitis Viruses, Tick-BorneForestsHumansIndiaIxodidaeKyasanur Forest DiseaseMonkey DiseasesPopulation DensityPrevalenceHaemaphysalis speciesIndiaIxodidaeKyasanur forest diseaseWestern Ghats

Identifiers

PMID29594846
OpenAlexW2798001821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.