Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29594812›Full record

ArticleNeurotoxicity research2018

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Is an Independent Predictor of 30-Day Mortality of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients: a Validation Cohort Study.

Fei Wang, Li Wang, Ting-Ting Jiang, Jian-Jun Xia, Feng Xu, Li-Juan Shen, Wen-Hui Kang, Yong Ding, Li-Xia Mei, Xue-Feng Ju and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotoxicity research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Intracranial Hemorrhage in COVID-19 Patients.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2021
    Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fei WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Li WangEmergency Department, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Ting-Ting JiangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Jian-Jun XiaEmergency Department, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Feng XuEmergency Department, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Li-Juan ShenDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Wen-Hui KangEmergency Department, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Yong DingJiading Town Community Healthcare Center, Jiading District, Shanghai, China.
Li-Xia MeiJiading Town Community Healthcare Center, Jiading District, Shanghai, China.
Xue-Feng JuEmergency Department, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Shan-You HuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China. hushanyou9@163.com.
Xiao WuEmergency Department, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China. wx5187@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9998-8084

Funding

Foundation of the Public Health Bureau of Jiading 2017-KY-09New Key Subjects of Jiading District 2017-ZD-03The Seed Fund (Natural Science Class) of Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences HMSF-17-21-026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a previous study in patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), we found an association between high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with poor short-term mortality. In the current study, this preliminary finding was validated using an independent patient cohort. A total of 181 ICH patients (from January 2016 to December 2017) were included. Diagnosis was confirmed using computed tomography (CT) in all cases. Patient survival (up to 30 days) was compared between subjects with high NLR (above the 7.35 cutoff; n = 74) versus low NLR (≤ 7.35; n = 107) using Kaplan-Meier analysis. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors that influenced the 30-day mortality. Correlation between NLR with other relevant factors (e.g., C-reactive protein (CRP) and fibrinogen) was examined using Spearman correlation analysis. The 30-day mortality was 19.3% (35/181) in the entire sample, 37.8% (28/74) in the high-NLR group, and 6.5% (7/107) in the low-NLR group (P < 0.001). In comparison to the low-NLR group, the high-NLR group had higher rate of intraventricular hemorrhage (29.7 vs. 16.8%), ICH volume (median 23.9 vs. 6.0 cm

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCerebral HemorrhageCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedNeutrophilsPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsStatistics, NonparametricTomography, X-Ray Computed30-day mortalityInflammationIntracerebral hemorrhageNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

Identifiers

PMID29594812
PMCPMC6154212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.