Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29594609›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2018

Reliability of a commercially available heterochromatic flicker photometer, the MPS2, for measuring the macular pigment optical density of a Japanese population.

Akira Obana, Yuko Gohto, Takatoshi Moriyama, Takahiko Seto, Hiroyuki Sasano, Shigetoshi Okazaki

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Akira ObanaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 1-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Naka-ku, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, 430-8558, Japan. obana@sis.seirei.or.jp.
Yuko GohtoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 1-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Naka-ku, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, 430-8558, Japan.
Takatoshi MoriyamaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 1-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Naka-ku, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, 430-8558, Japan.
Takahiko SetoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 1-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Naka-ku, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, 430-8558, Japan.
Hiroyuki SasanoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 1-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Naka-ku, Hamamatsu City, Shizuoka, 430-8558, Japan.
Shigetoshi OkazakiDepartment of Medical Spectroscopy, Institute for Medical Photonics Research, Preeminent Medical Photonics Education and Research Center, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital · JPHamamatsu University School of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe macular pigment optical density (MPOD) of a Japanese population was measured using a commercially based heterochromatic flicker photometer, the Macular Pigment Screener (MPS2). The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy and test-retest reliability of the MPS2 in Asian pigmented eyes. STUDY

designExperimental study to validate the medical instrument in humans.

methodsTwenty-four healthy Japanese participants with no systemic or eye diseases (men: 13, women: 11; mean [SD] age 38.6 [10.9 years]) were included. The concordance of the MPOD, obtained using the MPS2 and Macular Metrics II (MM2), and the test-retest reliability were examined.

resultsDetermination of the MPOD was unsuccessful in 1 participant; thus, the MPOD of 23 participants was analyzed. The mean (SD) MPOD measured with the detail-mode of the MPS2 was 0.63 (0.18) and with that of the MM2, it was 0.72 (0.23). The former was significantly lower than the latter (P = .003, paired t test). The MPOD measured with the MPS2 and the MM2 showed good concordance (r = 0.79, P < .001, Pearson product moment correlation). Bland-Altman analyses showed no systematic errors between the MPS2 and the MM2. The intraclass correlation coefficient over 5 measurement times with the detail-mode of the MPS2 was 0.80, and the mean coefficient of variation was 9.4%.

conclusionThe high concordance with the MM2 and good test-retest reliability found by this study suggest that the MPS2 is acceptable for use in a Japanese population. However, the mean MPOD yielded by the MPS2 was significantly lower than that yielded by the MM2. Therefore, the MPS2 and MM2 are not interchangeable in a single study.

Indexed as

AdultEquipment DesignFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansJapanMacula LuteaMacular PigmentMalePhotometryReproducibility of ResultsMacular PigmentAsian pigmented eyesHeterochromatic flicker photometryMacular pigment optical densityMPS2validation

Identifiers

PMID29594609
OpenAlexW2795080567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.