ReviewCurrent treatment options in neurology2018
Vaccine Strategies in Gliomas.
Review in Current treatment options in neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuroinflammation in Glioblastoma: Progress and Perspectives.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Concurrent gliomas in patients with multiple sclerosis.Communications medicine · 2023Article
- Looking Beyond the Glioblastoma Mask: Is Genomics the Right Path?Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Pediatric versus adult high grade glioma: Immunotherapeutic and genomic considerations.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Targeting Neuroinflammation in Brain Cancer: Uncovering Mechanisms, Pharmacological Targets, and Neuropharmaceutical Developments.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Introduction to immunotherapy for brain tumor patients: challenges and future perspectives.Neuro-oncology practice · 2020Review
- Intranasal Perillyl Alcohol for Glioma Therapy: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo discuss the current state of glioma vaccine development and highlight the challenges associated with clinical implementation of these approaches. RECENT
findingsVaccination strategies against gliomas have matured considerably during the past years, although proof-of efficacy from controlled clinical trials is still lacking. Advances in antigen discovery, including the definition of neoepitopes including epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII), isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1R132H and Histone (H)3.3K27M, using multi-omic approaches and computational algorithms allow targeting single antigens, but also implementing truly personalized approaches. In addition, new concepts of vaccine manufacturing including RNA and DNA vaccines improve immunogenicity and applicability in personalized settings. As an increasing amount of clinical data defy the concept of the central nervous system (CNS) as a strictly immunoprivileged site, novel vaccine approaches enter the clinic including critical efforts to identify biomarkers of response and resistance and strategies to overcome the immunosuppressive glioma microenvironment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.