Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29594476›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2019

Geographic and socioeconomic diversity of food and nutrient intakes: a comparison of four European countries.

Elly Mertens, Anneleen Kuijsten, Marcela Dofková, Lorenza Mistura, Laura D'Addezio, Aida Turrini, Carine Dubuisson, Sandra Favret, Sabrina Havard, Ellen Trolle and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Elly MertensDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, PO Box 8129, 6700 EV, Wageningen, The Netherlands. elly.mertens@wur.nl.
Anneleen KuijstenDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, PO Box 8129, 6700 EV, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Marcela DofkováCenter for Health, Nutrition and Food, National Institute of Public Health, Brno, Czech Republic.
Lorenza MisturaCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178, Rome, Italy.
Laura D'AddezioCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178, Rome, Italy.
Aida TurriniCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178, Rome, Italy.
Carine DubuissonFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (Anses)/Risk Assessment Department (DER), 14 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94701, Maisons-Alfort Cedex, France.
Sandra FavretFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (Anses)/Risk Assessment Department (DER), 14 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94701, Maisons-Alfort Cedex, France.
Sabrina HavardFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (Anses)/Risk Assessment Department (DER), 14 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94701, Maisons-Alfort Cedex, France.
Ellen TrolleDivision of Risk Assessment and Nutrition, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Søborg, Denmark.
Pieter Van't VeerDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, PO Box 8129, 6700 EV, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Johanna M GeleijnseDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, PO Box 8129, 6700 EV, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLAgence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail · FRConsiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria · ITNational Institute of Public Health · CZTechnical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

Horizon 2020 633692Top Consortia for Knowlegde and Innovation of the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs SD004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePublic health policies and actions increasingly acknowledge the climate burden of food consumption. The aim of this study is to describe dietary intakes across four European countries, as baseline for further research towards healthier and environmentally-friendlier diets for Europe.

methodsIndividual-level dietary intake data in adults were obtained from nationally-representative surveys from Denmark and France using a 7-day diet record, Italy using a 3-day diet record, and Czech Republic using two replicates of a 24-h recall. Energy-standardised food and nutrient intakes were calculated for each subject from the mean of two randomly selected days.

resultsThere was clear geographical variability, with a between-country range for mean fruit intake from 118 to 199 g/day, for vegetables from 95 to 239 g/day, for fish from 12 to 45 g/day, for dairy from 129 to 302 g/day, for sweet beverages from 48 to 224 ml/day, and for alcohol from 8 to 15 g/day, with higher intakes in Italy for fruit, vegetables and fish, and in Denmark for dairy, sweet beverages and alcohol. In all countries, intakes were low for legumes (< 20 g/day), and nuts and seeds (< 5 g/day), but high for red and processed meat (> 80 g/day). Within countries, food intakes also varied by socio-economic factors such as age, gender, and educational level, but less pronounced by anthropometric factors such as overweight status. For nutrients, intakes were low for dietary fibre (15.8-19.4 g/day) and vitamin D (2.4-3.0 µg/day) in all countries, for potassium (2288-2938 mg/day) and magnesium (268-285 mg/day) except in Denmark, for vitamin E in Denmark (6.7 mg/day), and for folate in Czech Republic (212 µg/day).

conclusionsThere is considerable variation in food and nutrient intakes across Europe, not only between, but also within countries. Individual-level dietary data provide insight into the heterogeneity of dietary habits beyond per capita food supply data, and this is crucial to balancing healthy and environmentally-friendly diets for European citizens.

Indexed as

Socioeconomic FactorsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCzech RepublicDenmarkDietDiet RecordsFemaleFranceHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedNutrientsNutrientsDietDietary guidelinesEuropeFoodsNutrientsSUSFANS

Identifiers

PMID29594476
PMCPMC6561990
OpenAlexW2795026863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.