ArticleMikrochimica acta2018
Graphene and graphene oxide as a solid matrix for extraction of membrane and membrane-associated proteins.
Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell membrane biomimetic nanoplatforms: a new strategy for immune escape and precision targeted therapy.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Advancing Albumin Isolation from Human Serum with Graphene Oxide and Derivatives: A Novel Approach for Clinical Applications.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Metal organic layers enabled cell surface engineering coupling biomembrane fusion for dynamic membrane proteome profiling.Chemical science · 2023Article
- Applications of three-dimensional graphenes for preconcentration, extraction, and sorption of chemical species: a review.Mikrochimica acta · 2019Review
- The UV absorption of graphene oxide is size-dependent: possible calibration pitfalls.Mikrochimica acta · 2019Article
- A porous graphene sorbent coated with titanium(IV)-functionalized polydopamine for selective lab-in-syringe extraction of phosphoproteins and phosphopeptides.Mikrochimica acta · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The extraction of membrane proteins remain a challenge due to innate hydrophobicity, dynamic discrepancy, and restrain effect of membrane lipids. Nanomaterials with high surface area have competency of hydrophobic-hydrophobic lipid interactions. It is shown here that both graphene and graphene oxide dissolved in solubilization buffer are viable sorbents for efficient extraction of membrane proteins. LC-MS/MS analysis further revealed that graphene (50-200 nm) and graphene oxide (50-200 nm) can enrich more kinds of membrane proteins than a commercially available kit. Graphene was further applied to the enrichment of membrane proteins of normal cells as well as cancer cells, and 1079 and 872 proteins were identified, respectively, among which 56.5% and 60.5% were membrane proteins. In particular, 241 proteins were significantly regulated in cancer cells. Gene expression of 15 proteins was verified by qRT-PCR, and 4 of them were further quantified by immunoassay. These data collectively demonstrate that graphene has great potential to improve membrane protein extractions and thus can serve downstream cancer proteomics. Graphical abstract Two dimensional carbon nanomaterials, including graphene and graphene oxide, were employed as solid matrix to avoid lipid bilayer interference and enhance the extraction efficiency of membrane and membrane associated proteins. The strategy will benefit downstream membrane proteomics analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.