Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29594341›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2018

Anaerobic bacteria in wastewater treatment plant.

Marcin Cyprowski, Agata Stobnicka-Kupiec, Anna Ławniczek-Wałczyk, Aleksandra Bakal-Kijek, Małgorzata Gołofit-Szymczak, Rafał L Górny

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Developing rumen mimicry process for biological ammonia synthesis.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2023
    Article
  11. Trends in Biological Ammonia Production.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcin CyprowskiCentral Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, 16 Czerniakowska St., 00-701, Warsaw, Poland. macyp@o2.pl.ORCID 0000-0001-6704-4567
Agata Stobnicka-KupiecCentral Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, 16 Czerniakowska St., 00-701, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna Ławniczek-WałczykCentral Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, 16 Czerniakowska St., 00-701, Warsaw, Poland.
Aleksandra Bakal-KijekCentral Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, 16 Czerniakowska St., 00-701, Warsaw, Poland.
Małgorzata Gołofit-SzymczakCentral Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, 16 Czerniakowska St., 00-701, Warsaw, Poland.
Rafał L GórnyCentral Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, 16 Czerniakowska St., 00-701, Warsaw, Poland.
Central Institute for Labour Protection · PL

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education/National Centre for Research and Development II.P.17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this study was to assess exposure to anaerobic bacteria released into air from sewage and sludge at workplaces from a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP).

methodsSamples of both sewage and sludge were collected at six sampling points and bioaerosol samples were additionally collected (with the use of a 6-stage Andersen impactor) at ten workplaces covering different stages of the technological process. Qualitative identification of all isolated strains was performed using the biochemical API 20A test. Additionally, the determination of Clostridium pathogens was carried out using 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis.

resultsThe average concentration of anaerobic bacteria in the sewage samples was 5.49 × 10

conclusionsAnaerobic bacteria were widely present both in the sewage and in the air at workplaces from the WWTP, especially when the technological process was performed in closed spaces. Anaerobic bacteria formed small aggregates with both wastewater droplets and dust particles of sewage sludge origin and as such may be responsible for adverse health outcomes in exposed workers.

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyAir PollutantsAir Pollutants, OccupationalAir PollutionAnalysis of VarianceBacteria, AnaerobicClostridiumDatabases, Nucleic AcidEnvironmental MonitoringHumansOccupational ExposurePolandRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWastewaterAir PollutantsAir Pollutants, OccupationalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWastewaterAnaerobic bacteriaExposure assessmentPCRSize distributionWastewater treatment plant

Identifiers

PMID29594341
PMCPMC6002452
OpenAlexW2794889277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.