Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29594333›Full record

Trial reportRheumatology international2018

The effectiveness of the low-power laser and kinesiotaping in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, a pilot study.

A Güner, L Altan, M Kasapoğlu Aksoy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Rheumatology international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04949373 (Evaluation of the Efficacy of High Intensity Laser), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04949373 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Efficacy of High Intensity Laser (HILT) Therapy in Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorAfyonkarahisar Health Sciences UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsCarpal Tunnel Syndrome, Entrapment Neuropathy, Median Neuropathy, Musculoskeletal DiseasesArmsHigh-intensity laser therapy (HILT), Sham High-intensity laser therapy (sham HILT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A GünerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, Yildirim, 16800, Bursa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7220-0288
L AltanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, Yildirim, 16800, Bursa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6453-8382
M Kasapoğlu AksoyDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, Yildirim, 16800, Bursa, Turkey. melihakasapoglu@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4688-0464
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRBursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mild and moderate cases of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the conservative approach is suggested. The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the effect of low-power laser versus the combination of low-power laser and kinesiotaping on pain, muscle strength, functionality, and electrophysiologic parameters in the patients with CTS. The study was planned as single-blind, prospective, randomized control. 64 hands diagnosed with CTS were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups by closed envelope method. Low-power laser therapy was applied to Group 1 (21 hands), kinesiotaping and low-power laser therapy in group 2 (22 hands), sham laser therapy in Group 3 (21 hands). All patients were assessed by visual numeric pain scale (VNS), hand grip strength (HGS), finger pinch strength (FPS), the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTSQ), before treatment, after treatment (3rd week), and after (12th week) 3 months the treatment with the same physician. Motor and sensory nerve conduction studies were performed with electroneuromyography (ENMG) before the treatment (0th week) and at the end of the 12th week. Comparison of the group 1 with the group 3 showed significantly better improvement in the former in VNS, BCTSQ at 3rd week and 12th week compared to 0th week, and in FPS and HGS at 3rd week. Comparison of the group 2 with the group 3 showed significantly better improvement in the former VNS, BCTSQ, FPS and HGS at 3rd and 12th week compared to 0th week. When Group 1 and Group 2 were compared there was no statistically significant difference in any parameters in the 3rd week, but there was a statistically significant difference in favor of group 2 in FPS and HGS parameters at the 12th week. We have found that the kinesiotaping method applied with low-power laser treatment does not provide any additional benefit to the low-power laser treatment in the short term, however, in the long term, the increase in the HGS and FPS has occurred. In conclusion, low-power laser and kinesiotaping method in the treatment of CTS may be an effective and reliable treatment option in clinical parameters.

Indexed as

Athletic TapeAdultCarpal Tunnel SyndromeCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansLasers, SemiconductorLow-Level Light TherapyMaleMiddle AgedNeural ConductionNeurologic ExaminationPain MeasurementPilot ProjectsPinch StrengthProspective StudiesCarpal tunnel syndromeKinesiotapingLow-power laser

Identifiers

PMID29594333
OpenAlexW2795024721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.