Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29594236›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational radiation oncology2018

Treatment de-escalation for HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancer: Where do we stand?

Haitham Mirghani, Pierre Blanchard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Transoral robotic surgery and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of the oropharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Minocycline for symptom reduction during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a randomized clinical trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haitham MirghaniDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, France.
Pierre BlanchardDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancers have significantly better survival rates than tobacco and alcohol induced head and neck cancers. As HPV-positive patients are younger, healthier and far more likely to survive their disease, long-term treatment side effects are becoming a major issue. This has led the scientific and medical community to reassess the current treatment protocols in order to develop less toxic strategies while maintaining good oncological outcomes. In this article, we discuss the ongoing treatment de-escalation trials and highlight the issues raised by these studies.

Indexed as

Cancer/neoplasmHuman papillomavirus (HPV)Oropharynx/oropharyngealTreatment de-escalation/de-intensification

Identifiers

PMID29594236
PMCPMC5862680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.