Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29594136›Full record

ReviewMolecular neuropsychiatry2018

Crossing the Worm-Brain Barrier by Using

Donard S Dwyer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neuropsychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Application ofBiomolecules & therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Neuromodulation of swarming behavior inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neuromodulation of Swarming Behavior inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Neurodegeneration-related genes influencemicroPublication biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Catalytic Reaction Model of Suicide.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Increased Stress Resistance and Lifespan inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donard S DwyerDepartments of Psychiatry and Pharmacology, Toxicology and Neuroscience, LSU Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endophenotypes and Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) represent recent efforts to deconvolute psychiatric illnesses into fundamental symptom clusters or biological markers more closely linked to genetic influences. By taking this one step farther, these biomarkers can be reduced to protophenotypes - endophenotypes conserved during evolution - with counterparts in lower organisms including

Indexed as

AnorexiaAntidepressantsAntipsychoticsEndophenotypesMajor depressive disorderProtophenotypesSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID29594136
PMCPMC5836151
OpenAlexW2783804473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.