Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29593723›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2018

Analyzing Immunoglobulin Repertoires.

Neha Chaudhary, Duane R Wesemann

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Large scale paired antibody language models.PLoS computational biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Building Representation Learning Models for Antibody Comprehension.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Human IgMInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neha ChaudharyDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Duane R WesemannDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Harvard University · US

Funding

IMMUNOLOGIC BASIS OF RESISTANCE AND HYPERSENSITIVITYT32AI007306 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Nora Amanda Barrett, Joshua A Boyce · 1985 to 2026
$12.2M
Discovering the Role of Commensal Microbes on Primary B Lymphocyte DevelopmentR01AI113217 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WESEMANN, DUANE R. · 2015 to 2019
$3.3M
Decrypting IgE B Cell ImmunobiologyR01AI121394 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WESEMANN, DUANE R. · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI113217NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI121394NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic assembly of T cell receptor and B cell receptor (BCR) genes produces a vast diversity of lymphocyte antigen recognition capacity. The advent of efficient high-throughput sequencing of lymphocyte antigen receptor genes has recently generated unprecedented opportunities for exploration of adaptive immune responses. With these opportunities have come significant challenges in understanding the analysis techniques that most accurately reflect underlying biological phenomena. In this regard, sample preparation and sequence analysis techniques, which have largely been borrowed and adapted from other fields, continue to evolve. Here, we review current methods and challenges of library preparation, sequencing and statistical analysis of lymphocyte receptor repertoire studies. We discuss the general steps in the process of immune repertoire generation including sample preparation, platforms available for sequencing, processing of sequencing data, measurable features of the immune repertoire, and the statistical tools that can be used for analysis and interpretation of the data. Because BCR analysis harbors additional complexities, such as immunoglobulin (Ig) (i.e., antibody) gene somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination, the emphasis of this review is on Ig/BCR sequence analysis.

Indexed as

AnimalsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansReceptors, Antigen, B-CellReceptors, Antigen, T-CellSequence Analysis, DNAReceptors, Antigen, B-CellReceptors, Antigen, T-CellB cell repertoireimmunoglobulinnext-generation sequencingrepertoirestatistical analysis

Identifiers

PMID29593723
PMCPMC5861150
OpenAlexW2792924456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.