ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018
Bouba/Kiki in Touch: Associations Between Tactile Perceptual Qualities and Japanese Phonemes.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing semantic and phonetic similarities between Turkish and Japanese onomatopoeia.Cognitive processing · 2026Article
- The affective iconicity of segment and tone in Standard Chinese.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Acoustic parameter combinations underlying mapping of pseudoword sounds to multiple domains of meaning: Representational similarity analyses and machine-learning models.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
- Tactile and interpersonal sound symbolic associations in patients with multiple somatic symptoms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based detection of cognitive decline using SSWTRT: classification performance and decision analysis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- PHONETIC UNDERPINNINGS OF SOUND SYMBOLISM ACROSS MULTIPLE DOMAINS OF MEANING.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Synesthetic Correspondence: An Overview.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- A new test for evaluation of marginal cognitive function deficits in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus through expressing texture recognition by sound symbolic words.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Article
- The sound symbolism of food: the frequency of initial /PA-/ in words for (staple) food.Linguistics · 2023Article
- Sound-meaning associations allow listeners to infer the meaning of foreign language words.Communications psychology · 2023Article
- Selectively manipulating softness perception of materials through sound symbolism.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Trilled /r/ is associated with roughness, linking sound and touch across spoken languages.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Japanese Sound-Symbolic Words for Representing the Hardness of an Object Are Judged Similarly by Japanese and English Speakers.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Vowel Length Expands Perceptual and Emotional Evaluations in Written Japanese Sound-Symbolic Words.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Computer Vision System for Expressing Texture Using Sound-Symbolic Words.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Automatic Estimation of Multidimensional Personality From a Single Sound-Symbolic Word.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Food-texture dimensions expressed by Japanese onomatopoeic words.Journal of texture studies · 2020Article
- Haptic sound-symbolism in young Spanish-speaking children.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several studies have shown cross-modal associations between sounds and vision or gustation by asking participants to match pre-defined sound-symbolic words (SSWs), such as "bouba" or "kiki," with visual or gustatory materials. Here, we conducted an explorative study on cross-modal associations of tactile sensations using spontaneous production of Japanese SSWs and semantic ratings. The Japanese language was selected, because it has a large number of SSWs that can represent a wide range of tactile perceptual spaces with fine resolution, and it shows strong associations between sound and touch. In the experiment, we used 120 everyday materials to cover basic material categories that could be associated with fundamental dimensions of tactile perception. Upon contact with these materials, participants expressed their tactile sensations by using Japanese SSWs, and at the same time, evaluated the tactile sensations by semantic differential scales using adjective pairs. Thanks to the variety of testing materials, we were able to demonstrate the existence of systematic associations between sounds and tactile fundamental perceptual dimensions in a more detailed and comprehensive way than ever done so before. In particular, we found that for vowels, positive tactile ratings were associated with the back vowel (/u/), while negative ratings were associated with the front vowels (/i/ and /e/). The central vowels (/o/ and /a/) were mainly associated with rough, hard, and dry feelings. Consonants were categorized based on vocal features and articulation. The category of the voiced consonants (e.g., /dz/ and /g/) corresponded to feelings of roughness, while that of voiceless consonants (e.g., /ʦ/, and /s/) corresponded to feelings of smoothness. The categories of the bilabial plosive (/p/ and /b/) and voiced alveolar nasal (/n/) consonants were mainly related to soft, sticky and wet feelings, while that of voiceless alveolar affricate (/ʦ/) and voiceless velar plosive (/k/) consonants were related to hard, slippery and dry feelings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.