Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29593516›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2018

Online Adaptation to Altered Auditory Feedback Is Predicted by Auditory Acuity and Not by Domain-General Executive Control Resources.

Clara D Martin, Caroline A Niziolek, Jon A Duñabeitia, Alejandro Perez, Doris Hernandez, Manuel Carreiras, John F Houde

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Autonomic Arousal During Speech Production and Sensorimotor Adaptation.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
  3. Divided Attention Has Limited Effects on Speech Sensorimotor Control.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. DIVA Meets EEG: Model Validation Using Formant-Shift Reflex.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Relation of Articulatory and Vocal Auditory-Motor Control in Typical Speakers.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Contributions of Auditory and Somatosensory Feedback to Vocal Motor Control.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Clara D MartinBasque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, San Sebastian, Spain.
Caroline A NiziolekDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Jon A DuñabeitiaBasque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, San Sebastian, Spain.
Alejandro PerezBasque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, San Sebastian, Spain.
Doris HernandezDepartment of Psychology, Center for Interdisciplinary Brain Research, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Manuel CarreirasBasque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, San Sebastian, Spain.
John F HoudeDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language · ESIkerbasque · ESUniversidad Nebrija · ESUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Jyväskylä · FIUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a speaker's auditory feedback is altered, he adapts for the perturbation by altering his own production, which demonstrates the role of auditory feedback in speech motor control. In the present study, we explored the role of auditory acuity and executive control in this process. Based on the DIVA model and the major cognitive control models, we expected that higher auditory acuity, and better executive control skills would predict larger adaptation to the alteration. Thirty-six Spanish native speakers performed an altered auditory feedback experiment, executive control (numerical Stroop, Simon and Flanker) tasks, and auditory acuity tasks (loudness, pitch, and melody pattern discrimination). In the altered feedback experiment, participants had to produce the pseudoword "pep" (/pep/) while perceiving their auditory feedback in real time through earphones. The auditory feedback was first unaltered and then progressively altered in F1 and F2 dimensions until maximal alteration (F1 -150 Hz; F2 +300 Hz). The normalized distance of maximal adaptation ranged from 4 to 137 Hz (median of 75 ± 36). The different measures of auditory acuity were significant predictors of adaptation, while individual measures of cognitive function skills (obtained from the executive control tasks) were not. Better auditory discriminators adapted more to the alteration. We conclude that adaptation to altered auditory feedback is very well-predicted by general auditory acuity, as suggested by the DIVA model. In line with the framework of motor-control models, no specific claim on the implication of executive resources in speech motor control can be made.

Indexed as

adaptationaltered feedbackauditory acuityexecutive controlspeech production

Identifiers

PMID29593516
PMCPMC5857594
OpenAlexW2789463793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.