Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29593490›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018

A Comparative Study of Standardized Infinity Reference and Average Reference for EEG of Three Typical Brain States.

Gaoxing Zheng, Xiaoying Qi, Yuzhu Li, Wei Zhang, Yuguo Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. EEG is better left alone.Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gaoxing ZhengState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, School of Life Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Center for Computational Systems Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoying QiState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, School of Life Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Center for Computational Systems Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yuzhu LiState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, School of Life Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Center for Computational Systems Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wei ZhangState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, School of Life Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Center for Computational Systems Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yuguo YuState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, School of Life Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Center for Computational Systems Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The choice of different reference electrodes plays an important role in deciphering the functional meaning of electroencephalography (EEG) signals. In recent years, the infinity zero reference using the reference electrode standard technique (REST) has been increasingly applied, while the average reference (AR) was generally advocated as the best available reference option in previous classical EEG studies. Here, we designed EEG experiments and performed a direct comparison between the influences of REST and AR on EEG-revealed brain activity features for three typical brain behavior states (eyes-closed, eyes-open and music-listening). The analysis results revealed the following observations: (1) there is no significant difference in the alpha-wave-blocking effect during the eyes-open state compared with the eyes-closed state for both REST and AR references; (2) there was clear frontal EEG asymmetry during the resting state, and the degree of lateralization under REST was higher than that under AR; (3) the global brain functional connectivity density (FCD) and local FCD have higher values for REST than for AR under different behavior states; and (4) the value of the small-world network characteristic in the eyes-closed state is significantly (in full, alpha, beta and gamma frequency bands) higher than that in the eyes-open state, and the small-world effect under the REST reference is higher than that under AR. In addition, the music-listening state has a higher small-world network effect than the eyes-closed state. The above results suggest that typical EEG features might be more clearly presented by applying the REST reference than by applying AR when using a 64-channel recording.

Indexed as

average reference (AR)brain functional connectivity densitybrain lateralization effectphase lag indexreference electrode standardization technique (REST)weighted small-world network

Identifiers

PMID29593490
PMCPMC5859052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.