Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29593430›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2018

Prospective study of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 5 fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer - toxicities and response assessment.

David K Simson, Swarupa Mitra, Parveen Ahlawat, Upasna Saxena, Manoj Kumar Sharma, Sheh Rawat, Harpreet Singh, Babita Bansal, Lalitha Kameshwari Sripathi, Aditi Tanwar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David K SimsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Action Cancer Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Swarupa MitraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Parveen AhlawatDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Upasna SaxenaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Manoj Kumar SharmaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Sheh RawatDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Harpreet SinghDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Action Cancer Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Babita BansalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Action Cancer Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Lalitha Kameshwari SripathiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Action Cancer Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Aditi TanwarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesThe past 2 decades witnessed the strengthening of evidence favoring the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CHRT) in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. The study aims to evaluate the response and acute toxicities to neoadjuvant CHRT using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of rectal cancer. Predictive factors to achieve pathological complete response (pCR) were analyzed, as a secondary endpoint. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll consecutive patients who underwent IMRT as part of neoadjuvant CHRT in the treatment of rectal cancer between August 2014 and December 2016 at a tertiary cancer care center were accrued for the study. The cohort underwent CHRT with IMRT technique at a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions concurrent with continuous infusion of 5 fluorouracil during the first and the last 4 days of CHRT. Surgery was performed 6 weeks later and the pathological response to CHRT was noted.

resultsForty-three subjects were accrued for the study. Radiation dermatitis and diarrhea were the only observed grade ≥3 acute toxicities. Sphincter preservation rate (SPR) was 43.3%. pCR was observed in 32.6%. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression showed that carcinoembryonic antigen was the only independent predictive factor to achieve pCR.

conclusionIMRT as part of neoadjuvant CHRT in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer is well tolerated and gives comparable results with respect to earlier studies in terms of pathological response and SPR. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to firmly state that IMRT is superior to 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

Indexed as

chemoradiationIMRTneoadjuvantrectal cancerresponse

Identifiers

PMID29593430
PMCPMC5865559
OpenAlexW2792811033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.