Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29593339›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2018

Quantitative proteomic profiling of primary cancer-associated fibroblasts in oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Antigoni Manousopoulou, Annette Hayden, Massimiliano Mellone, Diana J Garay-Baquero, Cory H White, Fergus Noble, Monette Lopez, Gareth J Thomas, Timothy J Underwood, Spiros D Garbis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Antigoni ManousopoulouInstitute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Annette HaydenCancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Massimiliano MelloneCancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Diana J Garay-BaqueroClinical and Experimental Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Cory H WhiteClinical and Experimental Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Fergus NobleCancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Monette LopezUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Gareth J ThomasCancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Timothy J UnderwoodCancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. T.J.Underwood@soton.ac.uk.
Spiros D GarbisInstitute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. S.D.Garbis@soton.ac.uk.
University of Southampton · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 23924Cancer Research UK C34999/A13719Cancer Research UK RG84119Medical Research Council G1002565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) form the major stromal component of the tumour microenvironment (TME). The present study aimed to examine the proteomic profiles of CAFs vs. normal fibroblasts (NOFs) from patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma to gain insight into their pro-oncogenic phenotype.

methodsCAFs/NOFs from four patients were sub-cultured and analysed using quantitative proteomics. Differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were subjected to bioinformatics and compared with published proteomics and transcriptomics  datasets.

resultsPrincipal component analysis of all profiled proteins showed that CAFs had high heterogeneity and clustered separately from NOFs. Bioinformatics interrogation of the DEPs demonstrated inhibition of adhesion of epithelial cells, adhesion of connective tissue cells and cell death of fibroblast cell lines in CAFs vs. NOFs (p < 0.0001). KEGG pathway analysis showed a significant enrichment of the insulin-signalling pathway (p = 0.03). Gene ontology terms related with myofibroblast phenotype, metabolism, cell adhesion/migration, hypoxia/oxidative stress, angiogenesis, immune/inflammatory response were enriched in CAFs vs. NOFs. Nestin, a stem-cell marker up-regulated in CAFs vs. NOFs, was confirmed to be expressed in the TME with immunohistochemistry.

conclusionsThe identified pathways and participating proteins may provide novel insight on the tumour-promoting properties of CAFs and unravel novel adjuvant therapeutic targets in the TME.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCancer-Associated FibroblastsCells, CulturedDatasets as TopicEsophageal NeoplasmsFibroblastsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansPrimary Cell CultureProteomeProteomicsTranscriptomeTumor MicroenvironmentProteome

Identifiers

PMID29593339
PMCPMC5943522
OpenAlexW2795084638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.