Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29593300›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2018

Surviving threats: neural circuit and computational implications of a new taxonomy of defensive behaviour.

Joseph LeDoux, Nathaniel D Daw

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 176 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
176citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

176 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. How childhood adversity affects components of decision making.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Optogenetic fMRI for Brain-Wide Circuit Analysis of Sensory Processing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Exploring emotional expression in invertebrates: mechanisms, functions and phylogeny.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joseph LeDouxCenter for Neural Science and Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Nathaniel D DawPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Funding

NEURAL PATHWAYS UNDERLYING EMOTIONAL CONDITIONINGR01MH038774 · NIMH · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LEDOUX, JOSEPH E · 1985 to 2019
$3.8M
Brain Mechanisms of Avoidance: Implications for AddictionR56DA029053 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI LEDOUX, JOSEPH E · 2016 to 2016
$143k
NIDA NIH HHS R56 DA029053NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH038774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on defensive behaviour in mammals has in recent years focused on elicited reactions; however, organisms also make active choices when responding to danger. We propose a hierarchical taxonomy of defensive behaviour on the basis of known psychological processes. Included are three categories of reactions (reflexes, fixed reactions and habits) and three categories of goal-directed actions (direct action-outcome behaviours and actions based on implicit or explicit forecasting of outcomes). We then use this taxonomy to guide a summary of findings regarding the underlying neural circuits.

Indexed as

AggressionClassificationComputer SimulationDefense MechanismsModels, NeurologicalAnimalsAvoidance LearningDecision MakingGoalsHabitsHumansNeurons

Identifiers

PMID29593300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.