Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29593236›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Illusory occlusion affects stereoscopic depth perception.

Zhimin Chen, Rachel N Denison, David Whitney, Gerrit W Maus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhimin ChenDepartment of Psychology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. mandy_chen@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8075-072X
Rachel N DenisonDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6304-5236
David WhitneyDepartment of Psychology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Gerrit W MausPsychology Programme, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

Neural mechanisms of perceptual localizationR01EY018216 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI WHITNEY, DAVID V · 2007 to 2015
$2.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When occlusion and binocular disparity cues conflict, what visual features determine how they combine? Sensory cues, such as T-junctions, have been suggested to be necessary for occlusion to influence stereoscopic depth perception. Here we show that illusory occlusion, with no retinal sensory cues, interacts with binocular disparity when perceiving depth. We generated illusory occlusion using stimuli filled in across the retinal blind spot. Observers viewed two bars forming a cross with the intersection positioned within the blind spot. One of the bars was presented binocularly with a disparity signal; the other was presented monocularly, extending through the blind spot, with no defined disparity. When the monocular bar was perceived as filled in through the blind spot, it was perceived as occluding the binocular bar, generating illusory occlusion. We found that this illusory occlusion influenced perceived stereoscopic depth: depth estimates were biased to be closer or farther, depending on whether a bar was perceived as in front of or behind the other bar, respectively. Therefore, the perceived relative depth position, based on filling-in cues, set boundaries for interpreting metric stereoscopic depth cues. This suggests that filling-in can produce opaque surface representations that can trump other depth cues such as disparity.

Indexed as

AdultCuesDepth PerceptionFemaleHumansMaleOptical IllusionsProbabilityRetinaVision, BinocularVision DisparityVision, Monocular

Identifiers

PMID29593236
PMCPMC5871781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.