Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29593098›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2018

Administration of the Tablet Formulation of Olaparib in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: Practical Guidance and Expectations.

Kathleen N Moore, Michael J Birrer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Real-world data in patients withEcancermedicalscience · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen N MooreStephenson Oklahoma Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA Kathleen-Moore@ouhsc.edu.
Michael J BirrerMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

Lead Academic Participating Site for the Development and Conduct of NCTN TrialsU10CA180798 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI MANNEL, ROBERT S., MOORE, KATHLEEN N. · 2014 to 2018
$6.7M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olaparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase enzyme inhibitor that is approved for use in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OC) and genetic IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Olaparib has recently been approved for maintenance treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) that is in response to platinum-based chemotherapy. The originally approved capsule formulation was dosed as 400 mg twice daily (eight 50 mg capsules). The recommended olaparib tablet dose is 300 mg twice daily (two 150 mg tablets). The tablet is the new approved formulation based on the SOLO-2 trial results. Because the capsule and tablet formulations have different bioavailability, physicians must strictly adhere to the dosing instructions provided in the prescribing information. The tablet offers greater convenience for most patients, especially when using olaparib for maintenance therapy. This review discusses the differences between the two formulations, dose determination, and guidance for use of olaparib tablets by patients with OC.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsFemaleHumansOvarian NeoplasmsPhthalazinesPiperazinesTabletsAntineoplastic AgentsolaparibPhthalazinesPiperazinesTabletsBRCA mutationOlaparib, tabletOvarian cancerPoly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID29593098
PMCPMC6067940
OpenAlexW2794458938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.