New NICE guidelines for the management of stable angina.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. The comparative effects of oral Chinese patent medicines combined with western medicine in stable angina: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 179 trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
   Pooled it
2. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in contemporary guidelines: divergence between ESC and NICE across major cardiovascular diseases.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026
   Review
3. Chronic cOronary Syndrome in Swedish PRImary care (COSPRI)-a study protocol for a 5-year cluster randomized controlled trial on a novel package versus standard investigation in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome referred from primary health care.Trials · 2025
   Article
4. Optimized Clinical Feature Analysis for Improved Cardiovascular Disease Risk Screening.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024
   Article
5. Body fat percentage and CRP correlates with a composite score of vascular risk markers in healthy, young adults - The Lifestyle, Biomarkers, and Atherosclerosis (LBA) study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020
   Observational
6. Non-invasive Risk Stratification for Coronary Artery Disease: Is It Time for Subclassifications?Current cardiology reports · 2019
   Review
7. The utility of coronary computed tomography angiography in elderly patients.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as