Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29592829›Full record

ArticleSexual health2018

Low levels of chemsex among men who have sex with men, but high levels of risk among men who engage in chemsex: analysis of a cross-sectional online survey across four countries.

Jamie Frankis, Paul Flowers, Lisa McDaid, Adam Bourne

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Trajectories of Chemsex Engagement Across Time Among PrEP-Using Men Who Have Sex with Men: Results from the French ANRS-Prévenir Cohort.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Chemsex and Sexual Well-Being in Young Polish Men.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jamie FrankisSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK.
Paul FlowersSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK.
Lisa McDaidMRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Adam BourneAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health & Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic. 3086, Australia.
Glasgow Caledonian University · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU11Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background This paper establishes the prevalence of chemsex drug use among men who have sex with men (MSM), the extent to which these drugs are used in a sexual context, as well as their associated behaviours and circumstances of use.

methodsData from a cross-sectional, online survey of 2328 MSM recruited via gay sociosexual media in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland were analysed.

resultsWhile almost half (48.8%) of participants had ever taken illicit drugs, lifetime chemsex drug use was less common (18.0%) and far fewer reported chemsex drug use in the last year (8.2%) or last 4 weeks (3.0%). Just over one-quarter (27.1%) of men who used chemsex drugs in the last year reported no sexualised drug use, but almost three-quarters (72.9%) did. Only 6.1% of the whole sample reported sexualised chemsex drug use in the last year. The odds of reporting chemsex in the last year were significantly higher for men aged 36-45 years (AOR=1.96), single men (AOR=1.83), men who were HIV positive (AOR=4.01), men who report high-risk sex (AOR=4.46), being fisted (AOR=7.77) or had sex in exchange for goods other than money (AOR=4.7) in the last year and men who reported an HIV test in the last 3 months (AOR=1.53). DISCUSSION: Only a small proportion of MSM in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland reported chemsex, and, for the first time, it is demonstrated that not all chemsex drug use was sexualised. Nevertheless, MSM who engage in chemsex (MWEC) reported substantial sexual risk inequalities. These novel findings highlight several opportunities for intervention, particularly around the multiple vulnerabilities of MWEC, opportunities for early identification of those most vulnerable to chemsex-related harm and the potential to develop a specialised responsive patient pathway.

Indexed as

Illicit DrugsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesHomosexuality, MaleHumansIrelandMaleMiddle AgedNorthern IrelandPrevalenceScotlandSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexual BehaviorSubstance-Related DisordersIllicit Drugs

Identifiers

PMID29592829
PMCPMC6778053
OpenAlexW2795261428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.