Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29592528›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Barriers and Facilitating Factors for Research Involvement in Cancer Centers: A Survey of Colorectal Cancer Center Coordinators in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.

Christoph Kowalski, Stefan Post, Thomas Seufferlein, Stefan R Benz, Julia Ferencz, Simone Wesselmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christoph Kowalski1 Department for Certification, German Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan Post2 University Medical Center, Mannheim, Germany.
Thomas Seufferlein3 Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Stefan R Benz4 Klinikum Böblingen-Sindelfingen, Böblingen, Germany.
Julia Ferencz5 OnkoZert GmbH, Certification Institute of the German Cancer Society, Neu-Ulm, Germany.
Simone Wesselmann1 Department for Certification, German Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improvements in health care depend on research involving health-care providers (HCPs) and health-care organizations (HCOs). Existing research suggests that involvement in research studies is still much lower than it could be. This study investigates factors that may impede or facilitate research involvement. A standardized online questionnaire was used to carry out a survey, in 3 countries, of key informants in colorectal cancer centers that hold certification in accordance with the requirements of the German Cancer Society. A total of 184 individuals responded (response rate 65%). The respondents found it difficult to identify studies suitable for their patients (40% agreement), criticized the small overall number of studies available (48%), and found that many studies are not worthwhile financially (56%). Among respondents who were not involved in studies as the principal investigators (PIs), 66% agreed they lacked the research infrastructure needed and 81% that they did not have enough staff. Among respondents who were involved as PIs, only 22% indicated that their hospital management encouraged them to initiate and conduct clinical trials. Eighty-five percent of the respondents agreed that the general population lacks information about the importance of studies. Five recommendations for health policy makers are derived from these findings for ways of increasing the involvement of HCPs and HCOs in research, and in cancer research in particular.

Indexed as

AustriaCancer Care FacilitiesColorectal NeoplasmsData CollectionFemaleGermanyHumansMalePatient SelectionSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandcancerclinical trialconsentdata collectionpatient selectionrecruitmentresearch subjectsample size

Identifiers

PMID29592528
PMCPMC6852664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.